2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.121.098301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the Analogy Between Hyperbolic Embedding and Community Structure of Complex Networks

Abstract: We show that the community structure of a network can be used as a coarse version of its embedding in a hidden space with hyperbolic geometry. The finding emerges from a systematic analysis of several real-world and synthetic networks. We take advantage of the analogy for reinterpreting results originally obtained through network hyperbolic embedding in terms of community structure only. First, we show that the robustness of a multiplex network can be controlled by tuning the correlation between the community … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking a geometric view of complex networks is an emerging trend, as shown in a number of recent work. For example, the community structures were used as a coarse version of its embedding in a hidden space with hyperbolic geometry [55]. Topological data analysis, a typical geometric approach for data analysis, has been applied for analyzing complex systems [56].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking a geometric view of complex networks is an emerging trend, as shown in a number of recent work. For example, the community structures were used as a coarse version of its embedding in a hidden space with hyperbolic geometry [55]. Topological data analysis, a typical geometric approach for data analysis, has been applied for analyzing complex systems [56].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to generated topologies without community structure [7,46,47]. On the other hand, the considered real layers (Table I) exhibit community structure and trans-layer community correlations, which are manifested in their embeddings as groups of nodes that are similar-close along the angular similarity direction-in both layers simultaneously [14,48]. It would be interesting to modify the assignment of angular coordinates in the GMM-LP along the lines of [46] so that the model can also generate synthetic layers with community correlations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This picture is completely different for GR networks, reported in figure 6(b). GR networks show strong community organization at the topological level, resulting in large values of Q as measured by the Louvain method, which is induced by structural constraints imposed by the geometric models [46]. However, as expected, the critical gap does not detect soft communities, as demonstrated by the non-significant values of the modularity, compatible with zero, over different realizations of the randomization process.…”
Section: Community Structurementioning
confidence: 54%