2017
DOI: 10.1175/jhm-d-16-0097.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the Effect of Vegetation Dynamics on the Bulk Heat Transfer Coefficient to Improve Variational Estimation of Surface Turbulent Fluxes

Abstract: Estimation of turbulent heat fluxes by assimilating sequences of land surface temperature (LST) observations into a variational data assimilation (VDA) framework has been the subject of numerous studies. The VDA approaches are focused on the estimation of two key parameters that regulate the partitioning of available energy between sensible and latent heat fluxes. These parameters are neutral bulk heat transfer coefficient CHN and evaporative fraction (EF). The CHN mainly depends on the roughness of the surfac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The augmented VDA method was tested over four different sites by comparing the estimated value of heat fluxes with "in situ" measurement of heat fluxes. Results demonstrate that by taking C HN as a function of LAI, the rootmean-square-error (and bias) of sensible and latent heat flux estimates across the four sites are reduced on average by 31% (61%) and 21% (37%), respectively [66].…”
Section: E Uq Framework: a Guide To Well-posed Estimation Problemmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The augmented VDA method was tested over four different sites by comparing the estimated value of heat fluxes with "in situ" measurement of heat fluxes. Results demonstrate that by taking C HN as a function of LAI, the rootmean-square-error (and bias) of sensible and latent heat flux estimates across the four sites are reduced on average by 31% (61%) and 21% (37%), respectively [66].…”
Section: E Uq Framework: a Guide To Well-posed Estimation Problemmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Since during the growing season, bare soil may turn into a fully vegetated surface only within a few weeks, assuming the neutral bulk heat transfer coefficient C HN , as a monthly constant parameter may result in a significant amount of error in the estimation of surface fluxes. Abdolghafoorian et al [66] augmented the VDA method by characterizing the dynamic effect of vegetation phenology on C HN and formulating C HN as a function of LAI as proposed by Farhadi et al [34]. The augmented VDA method was tested over four different sites by comparing the estimated value of heat fluxes with "in situ" measurement of heat fluxes.…”
Section: E Uq Framework: a Guide To Well-posed Estimation Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bulk heat transfer coefficient (C H ) is related to the neutral bulk heat transfer coefficient (C HN ) and the atmospheric stability correction function (f) via (Abdolghafoorian et al, 2017;Bateni, Entekhabi, & Castelli, 2013;Xu et al, 2014Xu et al, , 2016) The bulk heat transfer coefficient (C H ) is related to the neutral bulk heat transfer coefficient (C HN ) and the atmospheric stability correction function (f) via (Abdolghafoorian et al, 2017;Bateni, Entekhabi, & Castelli, 2013;Xu et al, 2014Xu et al, , 2016)…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variational data assimilation (VDA) methods estimate the key unknowns of the surface energy balance (SEB) equations (i.e., neutral bulk heat transfer coefficient, C HN , and evaporative fraction, EF) by assimilating LST observations into the heat diffusion or force-restore equations (Abdolghafoorian et al, 2017;Bateni, Entekhabi, & Jeng, 2013;Bateni, Entekhabi, & Castelli, 2013;Bateni et al, 2014;Bateni & Entekhabi, 2012a;Bateni & Liang, 2012;Crow & Kustas, 2005;He et al, 2018;Qin et al, 2007;Sini et al, 2008;Xu et al, 2014Xu et al, , 2016Xu, Bateni, et al, 2015;Xu, He, et al, 2019). The unknown parameters of the VDA approaches (i.e., C HN and EF) are obtained by minimizing the misfit between the LST observations and estimations from the force-restore or heat diffusion equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%