2017
DOI: 10.1534/g3.117.043265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the Pyrenophora teres f. maculata–Barley Interaction Using Pathogen Genetics

Abstract: Pyrenophora teres f. maculata is the cause of the foliar disease spot form net blotch (SFNB) on barley. To evaluate pathogen genetics underlying the P. teres f. maculata–barley interaction, we developed a 105-progeny population by crossing two globally diverse isolates, one from North Dakota and the other from Western Australia. Progeny were phenotyped on a set of four barley genotypes showing a differential reaction to the parental isolates, then genotyped using a restriction site-associated-genotype-by-seque… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both interactions, host resistance is complex with numerous quantitative gene resistances effective at seedling, adult and all stages across the barley genome ( McLean et al, 2009 ; Liu et al, 2011 ). Pathogen virulence involves different QTL of varying effect, however, stronger differential responses to PTT occur and virulence in PTM is more quantitative and additive ( Shjerve et al, 2014 ; Carlsen et al, 2017 ; Koladia et al, 2017 ). Host resistance to PTM also appears to be characterized by quantitative minor gene resistance only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In both interactions, host resistance is complex with numerous quantitative gene resistances effective at seedling, adult and all stages across the barley genome ( McLean et al, 2009 ; Liu et al, 2011 ). Pathogen virulence involves different QTL of varying effect, however, stronger differential responses to PTT occur and virulence in PTM is more quantitative and additive ( Shjerve et al, 2014 ; Carlsen et al, 2017 ; Koladia et al, 2017 ). Host resistance to PTM also appears to be characterized by quantitative minor gene resistance only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited periods of co-evolution of PTR and PTM with their crop hosts, the complexity of their genetic interactions and shared ancestry may explain their smaller genomes alongside P. semeniperda . Disease is primarily governed by just three effectors in PTR ( Ciuffetti et al, 2010 ) and by iterative minor effect QTL in PTM ( Carlsen et al, 2017 ). In recently invaded crops, a formerly marginal host (one that is not normally susceptible to a pathogen but with occasional susceptible genotypes) may lead to partial suppression of basal resistance ( Niks and Marcel, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ptt, by contrast, has a lengthy association with barley that may go beyond the earliest written records of leaf diseases. Ptt produces both necrotrophic effectors, characteristic of pure necrotrophs, and avirulence genes, characteristic of biotrophs, and is notable for complex host-pathogen genetic interactions [12,41,42] compared to Ptr, where three main effectors explain most of the disease [43], and Ptm where minor effect QTL condition disease [44]. In general, the phylogeny presented supports the diversification of Ptt and recent divergence of Ptm and Ptr [11,30].…”
Section: Pyrenophora Whole Genome Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Globally, NFNB results in regular yield losses of between 10 and 40% with the potential for complete losses in environmental settings favorable to the pathogen, namely, susceptible cultivars with high sustained humidity and the absence of fungicides ( Mathre et al 1997 ; Liu et al 2011 ). Several studies have investigated the genetics of this host–pathogen interaction, utilizing biparental mapping populations of both the host and pathogen as well as genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in the host ( Liu et al 2011 ; Shjerve et al 2014 ; Carlsen et al 2017 ; Koladia et al 2017a ; Richards et al 2017 ). These studies have been critical in developing hypothetical models for this pathosystem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%