2023
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2023.3265647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the DS pattern of S2 was longer to the right than the DS pattern of S1 (thus, S2 presents higher densities and lower speeds not reached by S1), the DS pattern of S3 (in which the imperfection for driving is at 100%) is below the DS pattern of S2 and presents lower network speeds than S2 for the occurring network densities, and the DS pattern of S3 is longer to the right than the DS pattern of S2 (thus, S3 presents higher densities and lower speeds than S2). When the input flow was 0.1 veh/s per entrance (during the periods range [1,40]) and 0.125 veh/s per entrance (during the periods range [41,80]), we observed comparable network flows and densities (throughout time) among simulations, with S1 presenting higher speeds, followed by S2 and then S3. When the input flow was 0.1666 veh/s per entrance (during the periods range [81,200]) the difference in the network speed, density, and flow between S3 and the rest was notorious, highlighting that in S3, the critical density was reached and exceeded; traffic conditions with drivers driving with total imperfection are not sustainable, since the network gets congested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the DS pattern of S2 was longer to the right than the DS pattern of S1 (thus, S2 presents higher densities and lower speeds not reached by S1), the DS pattern of S3 (in which the imperfection for driving is at 100%) is below the DS pattern of S2 and presents lower network speeds than S2 for the occurring network densities, and the DS pattern of S3 is longer to the right than the DS pattern of S2 (thus, S3 presents higher densities and lower speeds than S2). When the input flow was 0.1 veh/s per entrance (during the periods range [1,40]) and 0.125 veh/s per entrance (during the periods range [41,80]), we observed comparable network flows and densities (throughout time) among simulations, with S1 presenting higher speeds, followed by S2 and then S3. When the input flow was 0.1666 veh/s per entrance (during the periods range [81,200]) the difference in the network speed, density, and flow between S3 and the rest was notorious, highlighting that in S3, the critical density was reached and exceeded; traffic conditions with drivers driving with total imperfection are not sustainable, since the network gets congested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The effects of signal coordination on the MFD were investigated in [32], which stated that the impacts of the strategies were sensitive to the signal cycle length chosen (60 s, 90 s, 120 s), and a poor signal coordination reduces the network capacity and the free-flow speed. Other variables that affect the MFD include junction regulation [33], traffic signals [34][35][36], network spatial characteristics [37], buses [38], large-scale activities [39], autonomous vehicles [40][41][42][43], turning traffic [44], rainfall [45], ride pooling [46], bicycle traffic [47], traffic incidents [48], the position of the loop detectors [49], and network heterogeneity [50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the introduction of AVs may lead to transformative shifts in traffic dynamics, affecting capacities and congestion patterns [10][11][12][13]. AVs can streamline traffic flow through communication and coordination, potentially optimizing fuel use [14]. However, uncertainties arise regarding the coexistence of AVs with human-driven vehicles, which may impact overall traffic capacities [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%