2022
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000008598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Orbital Floor Reconstruction: A National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Analysis

Abstract: Orbital floor fractures result in posterior globe displacement known as enophthalmos, and diplopia due to extraorbital soft tissue impingement. Surgical repair may involve the use of autolo-gous or synthetic materials. Previous studies have demonstrated a higher prevalence of orbital floor fractures among lower socioeconomic status (SES) populations. The authors aimed to characterize the impact of socioeconomic status on surgical management, outcomes, and use of synthetic orbital implant. The authors conducted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical outcomes and patient comorbidities were identified using native variables within the NIS and NASS datasets as well as through ICD-10 diagnosis codes. 15 Data collected included patient age, gender, FACE 4 (1) race, median household income percentages by zip code (0-25th, 26th to 50th, 51st to 75th, and 76th to 100th percentiles), and insurance type. In addition, all outcomes (excluding those related to comorbidity) were adjusted for the various comorbidity measures to reduce the risk of bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical outcomes and patient comorbidities were identified using native variables within the NIS and NASS datasets as well as through ICD-10 diagnosis codes. 15 Data collected included patient age, gender, FACE 4 (1) race, median household income percentages by zip code (0-25th, 26th to 50th, 51st to 75th, and 76th to 100th percentiles), and insurance type. In addition, all outcomes (excluding those related to comorbidity) were adjusted for the various comorbidity measures to reduce the risk of bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%