“…This r 0 (C-N)-value seemed too short in comparison with C-N bond lengths of comparable molecules, which fall in the range 1.15-1.19 Å , and in comparison with our preliminary value [22] of r e (C-N) = 1.169 Å forX 6 D FeCN, an isomer of FeNC, calculated already at that time at the MR-SDCI + Q + E rel / [Wachters + f (Fe), cc-pVTZ (C, N)] level of theory (see Section 2 below for the notation and the explanation of the acronyms). Too-short, experimentally derived C-N bond lengths have been reported not only forX 6 D FeNC, but also for the triatomic cyanidesX 3 U 4 CoCN (r 0 (C-N) = 1.1313(10) Å [23]), 2 D i,X=5/2 NiCN (r 0 (C-N) = 1.1591 (29) [24] and 1.1590(2) Å [25]), 1 R + CuCN (r 0 (C-N) = 1.1576(1) Å [26]), 2 R + ZnCN (r 0 (C-N) = 1.1464 Å [27]),X 2 P X¼3=2 BrCN + (r 0 = 1.103(78) Å [28]),X 6 R þ CrCN (r 0 = 1.1529(12) Å , r ð1Þ m ¼ 1:148 Å [29]), 1 R + AgCN (r 0 = 1.15527(67) Å , r ð2Þ m ¼ 1:160259ð58Þ Å [30]), and 1 R + AuCN (r 0 = 1.1586(24) Å , r s = 1.158654(10) Å [30]). …”