2023
DOI: 10.1108/cbth-11-2022-0198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing traveling Instagrammers: an exploration of socio-psychological concepts, travel typologies and posting motives

Abstract: Purpose This study aims to understand how traveling Instagrammers should be characterized by bridging socio-psychological concepts with Instagram usage and travel typologies. Design/methodology/approach Using analysis of variance, differences between non-Instagrammers and passive and active users were identified with regard to their personality traits and human values; traveling Instagrammers and their travel types were characterized in more detail using k-means clustering, and, finally, posting behavior was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 111 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although visual research presents an innovative approach to the analysis of communication strategies and to understanding a particular world , the use of this methodology, also applied to social media, presents ethical challenges (see Ivanova et al , 2021; Warr et al , 2016). For example, results can only be applied to the cultural context analysed in the paper (see also Egger, 2023). Ethical issues in visual research also include mitigating biases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although visual research presents an innovative approach to the analysis of communication strategies and to understanding a particular world , the use of this methodology, also applied to social media, presents ethical challenges (see Ivanova et al , 2021; Warr et al , 2016). For example, results can only be applied to the cultural context analysed in the paper (see also Egger, 2023). Ethical issues in visual research also include mitigating biases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%