2013
DOI: 10.1021/ja400243r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge-Controlled Switchable CO2 Capture on Boron Nitride Nanomaterials

Abstract: Increasing concerns about the atmospheric CO2 concentration and its impact on the environment are motivating researchers to discover new materials and technologies for efficient CO2 capture and conversion. Here, we report a study of the adsorption of CO2, CH4, and H2 on boron nitride (BN) nanosheets and nanotubes (NTs) with different charge states. The results show that the process of CO2 capture/release can be simply controlled by switching on/off the charges carried by BN nanomaterials. CO2 molecules form we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
247
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 315 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
12
247
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We also performed Bader charge analysis 35 and computed the charge difference, Δq = q C r À q C n , where q C r and q C n are the total charge on the C atom in • CH 3 from reduced and neutral complexes, respectively, which was found to be 0.47e.I n contrast, for the CNT case, Δq was estimated to be 0.03e, which indicates that the extra electron is delocalized over the CNT surface and does not particularly contribute to the new CÀC bond formation, resulting in only a small increase of their binding energy toward • CH 3 upon reduction. For BNNTs the valence electrons on tube surface are localized around N atoms (Figure 1b), and, therefore, the excess electrons likely fill the empty p orbitals of B atoms 36 and are able to form a strong covalent bond together with the unpaired electrons from the radical. The empty B atom sites, which serve as the localization sites for the excess electrons, make reductive functionalization of BNNTs an efficient route to achieve covalent chemistry on B sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also performed Bader charge analysis 35 and computed the charge difference, Δq = q C r À q C n , where q C r and q C n are the total charge on the C atom in • CH 3 from reduced and neutral complexes, respectively, which was found to be 0.47e.I n contrast, for the CNT case, Δq was estimated to be 0.03e, which indicates that the extra electron is delocalized over the CNT surface and does not particularly contribute to the new CÀC bond formation, resulting in only a small increase of their binding energy toward • CH 3 upon reduction. For BNNTs the valence electrons on tube surface are localized around N atoms (Figure 1b), and, therefore, the excess electrons likely fill the empty p orbitals of B atoms 36 and are able to form a strong covalent bond together with the unpaired electrons from the radical. The empty B atom sites, which serve as the localization sites for the excess electrons, make reductive functionalization of BNNTs an efficient route to achieve covalent chemistry on B sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been used to successfully determine the interactions between some gases and boron nitride nanotubes, boron nitride nanosheets, boron carbon nanotubes, and boron nanomaterials. [45][46][47][48] The self-consistent field (SCF) procedure was used with a convergence threshold of 10 -6 au on energy and electron density. The direct inversion of the iterative subspace technique developed by Pulay is used with a subspace size 6 to speed up SCF convergence on these systems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24] An all electrons double numerical atomic orbital augmented by dpolarization functions (DNP) was used as basis set, which has been successfully used to determine the electronic structures of nanomaterials. 25 The calculation models were built according to the experimental lattice parameters. [26][27] The electronic Brillouin zone was sampled by using a MonkhorstPack grid of sample spacing 0.002Å -1 .…”
Section: Theoretical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%