2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.125126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge density functional plus U theory of LaMnO3 : Phase diagram, electronic structure, and magnetic interaction

Abstract: We perform charge density functional theory plus U calculation of LaMnO3. While all the previous calculations were based on spin density functionals, our result and analysis show that the use of spin-unpolarized charge-only density is crucial to correctly describe the phase diagram, electronic structure and magnetic property. Using magnetic force linear response calculation, a long-standing issue is clarified regarding the second neighbor out-of-plane interaction strength. We also estimate the orbital-resolved… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
(141 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, there is no intrinsic magnetism of the ligand (halide) states, which, on the contrary, appears in sDFT(+U ) case. DFT + U and sDFT + U have been previously shown to produce substantially different results for the total energies [52][53][54][55] and the exchange interaction parameters [56]. As was mentioned above, the magnetism of ligands is particularly important in CrX 3 systems, which motivated us to compare the results obtained with these two flavors of +U methods.…”
Section: A Electronic Structurementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, there is no intrinsic magnetism of the ligand (halide) states, which, on the contrary, appears in sDFT(+U ) case. DFT + U and sDFT + U have been previously shown to produce substantially different results for the total energies [52][53][54][55] and the exchange interaction parameters [56]. As was mentioned above, the magnetism of ligands is particularly important in CrX 3 systems, which motivated us to compare the results obtained with these two flavors of +U methods.…”
Section: A Electronic Structurementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In detail, J ij is estimated as a response to small spin tiltings (as a perturbation) from the given converged solution, as shown the detailed formulation in [37][38][39]. More application examples of OpenMX in calculating Heisenberg exchange parameters are reported by the OpenMX's developers in the literature [38][39][40][41]. In fact, the unit cell here is already very large and thus the lattice translation vectors have negligible influence on the calculated J ij .…”
Section: The Constant Term In H Cfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we first estimate the interaction parameters based on the most advanced scheme, namely, cRPA [56,57] which is computationally demanding but known as quite reliable [68][69][70][71][72]. The calculated on-site Coulomb repulsion U = 2.0 eV for the bulk CrI 3 and U = 2.9 eV for monolayer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%