2017
DOI: 10.1038/nphys4191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge density wave quantum critical point with strong enhancement of superconductivity

Abstract: led to a great interest in QCPs are the very unusual properties that are observed near a QCP, such as unconventional superconductivity (SC), non-Fermi-liquid or anomalous critical behaviour 3-6 . Quantum fluctuations are therefore suspected to cause these anomalous properties, but most aspects are far from being understood and are still the subject of active discussions. An issue that has attracted great interest is the appearance of unconventional SC observed at magnetic QCPs, that is where a magnetic ordered… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
82
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
10
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it has been proposed that the accumulation of entropy near a quantum critical point (QCP), due to quantum critical fluctuations, may give rise to novel phases such as supercon-ductivity [15]. However, one difference between a magnetic QCP in strongly correlated electronic systems and that of a QCP in CDW compounds, is that non-Fermi liquid behaviors seem to be absent in the vicinity of a CDW QCP [1][2][3]. Furthermore, the observation of CDW domain walls above the superconducting dome and the separation of the CDW QCP and superconductivity in pressurized 1T -TiSe 2 seems to challenge the view that the appearance of a superconducting dome is associated with the CDW QCP [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it has been proposed that the accumulation of entropy near a quantum critical point (QCP), due to quantum critical fluctuations, may give rise to novel phases such as supercon-ductivity [15]. However, one difference between a magnetic QCP in strongly correlated electronic systems and that of a QCP in CDW compounds, is that non-Fermi liquid behaviors seem to be absent in the vicinity of a CDW QCP [1][2][3]. Furthermore, the observation of CDW domain walls above the superconducting dome and the separation of the CDW QCP and superconductivity in pressurized 1T -TiSe 2 seems to challenge the view that the appearance of a superconducting dome is associated with the CDW QCP [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in figure 4, the χ(T) shows an upward behavior below 50 K, which can be attributed to a tiny amount of paramagnetic defects in non-magnetic or weakly-correlated magnetic systems [8,30]. Such upturn in χ(T) is also observed in other non-magnetic materials, for instance, Lu(Pt 1−x Pd x ) 2 In [8] and LaPtGe 3 (T c = 1.2 K) superconductors [31]. Furthermore, we find the χ(T) curve between 5 K and 50 K could be well fitted by a modified Curie-Weiss law [32][33][34], reading…”
Section: Magnetic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The drop of χ across the kink temperature (T k ) implies a decrease of electronic DOS at Fermi energy (E F ). The quasilinear behavior of χ above the T k and its weak temperature dependence have been widely observed in some CDW materials like Cu x TiSe 2 [7], Lu(Pt 1−x Pd x ) 2 In [8], and (Sr, Ca) 3 Ir 4 Sn 13 [9]. In Cu 0.09 Bi 2 Se 3 , the superconductivity is induced only by Cu intercalation, which is in favor of Cu 1+ non-magnetic state (as is in the case of interstitial site, see reference [23]).…”
Section: Magnetic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The common characteristic temperatures suggest the features in ρ(T ) are related to the sign-change of the Hall effect, and thus Fermi-surface reconstruction. The behavior of ρ(T ) is reminiscent to that associated with phase transitions that open a gap on the Fermi-surface such as charge-or spin-density waves (26)(27)(28)(29). In these systems, the initial increase in ρ(T ) is interpreted as a reduction in charge carriers by a gap opening.…”
Section: Signatures Of Fermi-surface Reconstruction From Electricalmentioning
confidence: 99%