1990
DOI: 10.1016/0370-1573(90)90104-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge exchange in atom-surface collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
215
0
4

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 511 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
1
215
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…When an alkali-metal atomic particle is in the vicinity of a surface, its ionization level shifts towards the Fermi level of the solid due to the interaction with its image charge, and it also broadens due to overlap of the projectile atomic level and surface wave functions [32]. In the resonant charge transfer (RCT) model, which is typically used to describe alkali-surface interactions, electrons tunnel between the projectile and the solid through a non-adiabatic process, and the neutralization probability is determined along the outgoing trajectory while the projectile is still within a few Å's of the surface.…”
Section: Low Energy Ion Scattering (Leis) Is An Experimental Techniqumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When an alkali-metal atomic particle is in the vicinity of a surface, its ionization level shifts towards the Fermi level of the solid due to the interaction with its image charge, and it also broadens due to overlap of the projectile atomic level and surface wave functions [32]. In the resonant charge transfer (RCT) model, which is typically used to describe alkali-surface interactions, electrons tunnel between the projectile and the solid through a non-adiabatic process, and the neutralization probability is determined along the outgoing trajectory while the projectile is still within a few Å's of the surface.…”
Section: Low Energy Ion Scattering (Leis) Is An Experimental Techniqumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the prediction of the RCT model that the neutral fraction should change in the opposite direction as the work function. 2 A striking feature of Fig. 4͑b͒, however, is that the I SSP neutral fractions are considerably larger than those of the Ni SSP over the entire iodine coverage range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The shape of the work function curves are roughly ''mirrored'' in the neutral fraction curves, which is consistent with the prediction of the RCT model that the neutral fraction goes in the opposite direction as the work function change. 15 A surprising feature of the data, however, is that the I SSP neutral fractions are considerably larger than those of the Fe SSP over the entire iodine exposure range. 22 Similar results are found for bromine adsorption on Fe͑110͒, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Exposure Dependence Of the Neutral Fractionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…͑1͒ for the analysis of our data by comparing, in certain instances, the N obtained from Eq. ͑1͒ to the N obtained by a complete solution of the Newns-Anderson Hamiltonian in the independent particle picture 15,42,43 and found them to be comparable.…”
Section: Semiquantitative Theoretical Estimatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation