2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2010.11.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge exchange of He+-ions with aluminium surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At an interaction distance of 0.75 a.u., He 1s is known to be shifted above the Fermi level E F of Al [38,39]. This leads to very effective neutralization of He þ ions within 1-2 monolayers [40]. The same promotion mechanism also enables ionization of He atoms: at sufficiently close distance neutral He can lose an electron and thus become (re)ionized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At an interaction distance of 0.75 a.u., He 1s is known to be shifted above the Fermi level E F of Al [38,39]. This leads to very effective neutralization of He þ ions within 1-2 monolayers [40]. The same promotion mechanism also enables ionization of He atoms: at sufficiently close distance neutral He can lose an electron and thus become (re)ionized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the maximum intensity of backscattered projectiles, typically is found at a lower energy than kE0 due to interactions of the projectile with the target electrons causing a deceleration of the projectile (electronic stopping). The asymmetric shape of the Al peak is mainly due to contributions of re-ionized projectiles scattered from the surface [15]. Projectiles scattered from deeper layers, which are re-ionized on the exit trajectory, result in a continuous background for Eth < E < kE0.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, the peak can be fitted with two Gaussians under consideration of the background (dash-dotted line). The peak position of the two Gaussians differs by ~ 20 eV, representing contributions from either projectiles surviving AN (black dashed line) or from re-ionized projectiles (black dotted line), both scattered from the surface [15]. If the distance between the two peaks were larger than their combined FWHM, information on both Auger neutralization and re-ionization efficiency could be straightforward deduced.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5f. For both projectiles, we observed alternate neutralization and re-ionization processes along their trajectories [51,71]. These differences in the electronic charge of the projectiles in Fig.…”
Section: (A) (B)mentioning
confidence: 91%