2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.111.092501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge Form Factor and Sum Rules of Electromagnetic Response Functions inC12

Abstract: An ab initio calculation of the 12 C elastic form factor, and sum rules of longitudinal and transverse response functions measured in inclusive (e, e ) scattering, is reported, based on realistic nuclear potentials and electromagnetic currents. The longitudinal elastic form factor and sum rule are found to be in satisfactory agreement with available experimental data. A direct comparison between theory and experiment is difficult for the transverse sum rule. However, it is shown that the calculated one has lar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
169
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
12
169
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Later calculations of the charge form factors of 3 H, 3 He, and 4 He with realistic variational wave functions reaffirm the need for a substantial exchange charge effect for agreement with the empirical values [38]. This exchange current effect is most prominent in the lightest nuclei, and less so in the case of heavier nuclei as 16 O and 40 Ca, where the shell structure is most prominent [39,40]. The pion exchange effect nevertheless does improve slightly the agreement between the calculated and empirically extracted charge distributions throughout the periodic table [41].…”
Section: Nuclear Charge Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Later calculations of the charge form factors of 3 H, 3 He, and 4 He with realistic variational wave functions reaffirm the need for a substantial exchange charge effect for agreement with the empirical values [38]. This exchange current effect is most prominent in the lightest nuclei, and less so in the case of heavier nuclei as 16 O and 40 Ca, where the shell structure is most prominent [39,40]. The pion exchange effect nevertheless does improve slightly the agreement between the calculated and empirically extracted charge distributions throughout the periodic table [41].…”
Section: Nuclear Charge Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As a result, the method is very accurate but computationally very costly and allows one to access only nuclei with A 12 [20,21]. Larger particle numbers can be accessed with Auxiliary-Field Diffusion Monte Carlo (AFDMC), which in addition to the stochastic approach to the particle coordinates also stochastically evaluates the summations in spin-isospin space [22], however at the cost of using simpler variational wave functions than those used in nuclear GFMC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, coupled cluster methods have been extended to study nuclear matter [19,20]. Quantum Monte Carlo methods, such as GFMC and AFDMC [21], have proved to be accurate for predicting properties of nuclei up to A=12 [22][23][24] and neutron matter [8,9]. Recently, new local versions of chiral forces have been fitted to scattering data, and can be included in GFMC and AFDMC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%