2016
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/13/135307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge neutrality of quasi-free-standing monolayer graphene induced by the intercalated Sn layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, a shift of approximately 0.7-2.0eV in bulk SiC C 1s and Si 2p peak positions is often observed in the XPS spectrum as a result of intercalation. 9,15,18,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] This shift indicates a change in the charge transfer between SiC and EG caused by the presence of an intercalant layer.…”
Section: Epitaxial Graphene On Silicon Carbide: Growth and Characteri...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a shift of approximately 0.7-2.0eV in bulk SiC C 1s and Si 2p peak positions is often observed in the XPS spectrum as a result of intercalation. 9,15,18,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] This shift indicates a change in the charge transfer between SiC and EG caused by the presence of an intercalant layer.…”
Section: Epitaxial Graphene On Silicon Carbide: Growth and Characteri...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such high electronic density of states is a characteristic of the metallic Sn-Si interface and has never been observed for other intercalants. Kim et al [34] previously claimed the metallicity of this Sn-Si interface but the inferior quality of the buffer layer sample used with significant density of states at EF before intercalation depreciates their statement. Peaks at binding energies of about 0.3, 1.2 and 2.6 eV may originate from the quantum well states due to the potential relief of the valence bands at the interface [35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…3(b) (the peak observed at ~0.4 eV below E F and at E F denoted by a black arrow is due to the absence of a well defined quasiparticle state by the energy gap at E D [25]). The formation of a disordered silicon-metal layer in the SiC substrate has been reported to significantly reduce substrate influence for the cases of epitaxial graphene with gold [13] and tin [15]. The silicon-metal layer could be responsible for the charge transfer back to the substrate, which realizes charge-neutral graphene and further lifting of the sublattice symmetry, leading to a larger energy gap than that of as-grown graphene, as observed in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the spontaneous polarization by charge redistribution from silicide [15,34] is assumed to be responsible for the decoupling of graphene from the substrate and the metal-to-insulator transition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation