2015
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/27/33/336302
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge optimized many-body (COMB) potential for dynamical simulation of Ni–Al phases

Abstract: An interatomic potential for the Ni-Al system is presented within the third-generation charge optimized many-body (COMB3) formalism. The potential has been optimized for Ni3Al, or the γ' phase in Ni-based superalloys. The formation energies predicted for other Ni-Al phases are in reasonable agreement with first-principles results. The potential further predicts good mechanical properties for Ni3Al, which includes the values of the complex stacking fault (CSF) and the anti-phase boundary (APB) energies for the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this outcome might be somewhat discouraging, predicting defect energies can be considered one of the most difficult tests to pass. Still, the CENT potential outperforms other force fields with respect to the accuracy of these values 80,81 . CENT could be further improved by specifically including such defect data points in the training set.…”
Section: Defectsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although this outcome might be somewhat discouraging, predicting defect energies can be considered one of the most difficult tests to pass. Still, the CENT potential outperforms other force fields with respect to the accuracy of these values 80,81 . CENT could be further improved by specifically including such defect data points in the training set.…”
Section: Defectsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It is known to work well for metallic, ionic and polymeric systems. Cuprous oxide in COMB 47 , 48 has B v , C 11 and cohesive energy (E c ) as 102 GPa, 114.1 GPa and −3.65 eV/atom while the DFT values are 111.5 GPa,124.16 GPa and −4.79 eV/atom respectively. Again, it is to be noted these values can be sensitive to the initial calculation set-up and the target property/data for which the force-fields were fit.…”
Section: Technical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex force-fields such as ReaxFF 44 , 45 and COMB potentials 47 , 48 are used for investigating heterogeneous systems. In these cases, it is generally common that the DFT convex hull plot and force-field convex hull plots are different.…”
Section: Technical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the vacancy formation energy dataset consists of 508 entries. We compare a subset of this dataset with available data from previous experimental and DFT-studies 14,[39][40][41][42][43] in Fig. 1a.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%