1997
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge separation in the reaction center of photosystem II studied as a function of temperature

Abstract: In photosystem II of green plants the key photosynthetic reaction consists of the transfer of an electron from the primary donor called P680 to a nearby pheophytin molecule. We analyzed the temperature dependence of this reaction by subpicosecond transient absorption spectroscopy over the temperature range 20-240 K using isolated photosystem II reaction centers from spinach. After excitation in the red edge of the Q y absorption band, the decay of the excited state can conveniently be described by two kinetic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

18
96
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
18
96
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in the absorbance spectra of P A and B A poses a fundamental question as to the location and mechanism of primary charge separation in PSII reaction centers. The similarity of the P + Q A --PQ A difference spectrum observed here at 80 K in Synechocystis to that observed at both 5 K (30) and 77 K (54) in Synechococcus indicates that the absorbance spectra of P A and B A are practically invariant between 5 and 80 K and that P + is stabilized on P A at all temperatures including at 5 K. Given the difference in the energies of the lowest excited singlet states (31 meV), the localization of singlet excitation on B A (684 nm) over P A (672.5 nm) is favored by a factor of ∼10 31 at 5 K. As the rate of charge separation is slower (0.4-21 ps) (29,(100)(101)(102) than the rate at which energy is equilibrated within the central pigments of the reaction center (100-250 fs) (103,104), the excited state that drives charge separation must be on B A rather than on P A at low temperature ( Figure 9A,B). This situation is different from what is observed in wild-type bacterial reaction centers where the strong coupling between the P A and P B FIGURE 9: (A) Scheme indicating the various fates of the reaction center following center excitation at 5 and 298 K. The initiators of primary charge separation are B A * at 5 K and B A *, P A * and possibly Ph A * at 298 K. 3 P is stabilized on B A at 5 K but is delocalized at 298 K. P + is stabilized primarily on P A at all temperatures.…”
Section: Location Of 3 P As a Function Of Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference in the absorbance spectra of P A and B A poses a fundamental question as to the location and mechanism of primary charge separation in PSII reaction centers. The similarity of the P + Q A --PQ A difference spectrum observed here at 80 K in Synechocystis to that observed at both 5 K (30) and 77 K (54) in Synechococcus indicates that the absorbance spectra of P A and B A are practically invariant between 5 and 80 K and that P + is stabilized on P A at all temperatures including at 5 K. Given the difference in the energies of the lowest excited singlet states (31 meV), the localization of singlet excitation on B A (684 nm) over P A (672.5 nm) is favored by a factor of ∼10 31 at 5 K. As the rate of charge separation is slower (0.4-21 ps) (29,(100)(101)(102) than the rate at which energy is equilibrated within the central pigments of the reaction center (100-250 fs) (103,104), the excited state that drives charge separation must be on B A rather than on P A at low temperature ( Figure 9A,B). This situation is different from what is observed in wild-type bacterial reaction centers where the strong coupling between the P A and P B FIGURE 9: (A) Scheme indicating the various fates of the reaction center following center excitation at 5 and 298 K. The initiators of primary charge separation are B A * at 5 K and B A *, P A * and possibly Ph A * at 298 K. 3 P is stabilized on B A at 5 K but is delocalized at 298 K. P + is stabilized primarily on P A at all temperatures.…”
Section: Location Of 3 P As a Function Of Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors have speculated that multiple routes for charge separation might exist as well in PSII owing to the much weaker exciton interaction between the reaction center pigments and the absence of a low-energy exciton band of P as a longwavelength trap (33,35). With extrapolation from the bacterial reaction centers, these multiple routes have been proposed by Dekker and van Grondelle (33) as possible sources of the heterogeneity in the kinetics of charge separation that has been observed in PSII (29,(100)(101)(102). Because of the localization of the triplet and the oxidized donor on P in the bacterial reaction centers and the inclined orientation of the reaction center triplet in PSII, Rutherford and co-workers (34,109) have speculated that the monomeric accessory B A chlorophyll might be all or part of P680.…”
Section: Location Of 3 P As a Function Of Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These dynamics all seem to represent a mixture of energy transfer, excited state decay, radical pair-formation and relaxation, in part due to the shallow equilibria between the excited pigments and the initial radical pair state(s). These observations and the difficulty in identifying the intrinsic charge separation rate (7,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) undoubtedly reflect the fact that the kinetics in the PSII RC are intrinsically complicated, but in part they are due to the difficulty in disentangling contributions from energy and electron transfer, because of the extensively overlapping pigment absorption bands in the PSII RC combined with the intrinsic heterogeneity of biological systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electron transport stops at the H molecule because the final quinone acceptors are missing in these preparations. In contrast to the bacterial RC, in the PSII RC the initial dynamics are highly multiexponential with lifetimes in the order of 100 and 300-400 fs, and 3, 10, and 30 ps (7,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). These dynamics all seem to represent a mixture of energy transfer, excited state decay, radical pair-formation and relaxation, in part due to the shallow equilibria between the excited pigments and the initial radical pair state(s).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 On the basis of this fact, detailed models have been proposed for the RC structure of PS II. 9, 10 Much work has been reported on the spectroscopy of the RC, 3,[11][12][13] but little is known about that of CP47. This protein, proximate to the RC, is the last one to be separated from the RC during isolation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%