2020
DOI: 10.1002/macp.201900415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge‐Transfer‐Complexed Conjugated Microporous Polymers (CT‐CMPs)

Abstract: oligomeric backbone. [12] The conjugated materials showed strong color changes (indicating CT-complex formation) from bright orange to deep green upon mechanical grinding in the solid state at room temperature. This color change was easily reversible by sonication in toluene. However, after dissolution of the material the ability to readily form a CT complex was lost. To overcome this, we chemically bonded the CT complexes to a semicrystalline cellulose template following previous work on the use of CT complex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher surface area to volume ratio of HB-PAMs resulting from the pancake morphology is advantageous for effective interaction with small molecule dopants for electronic and semiconducting applications. 41,68,69…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher surface area to volume ratio of HB-PAMs resulting from the pancake morphology is advantageous for effective interaction with small molecule dopants for electronic and semiconducting applications. 41,68,69…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher surface area to volume ratio of HB-PAMs resulting from the pancake morphology is advantageous for effective interaction with small molecule dopants for electronic and semiconducting applications. 41,68,69 The UV-vis absorption and photoluminescence spectra of p-PAM, m-PAM and HB-PAM-1 in CHCl 3 are shown in Fig. 6 and their optical properties are summarized in Table 5.…”
Section: Polymer Chemistry Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] It is necessary to evaluate the state of recently developed synthetic porous materials after ten years of development, which can be employed for a variety of CT applications, particularly in semiconductors. These porous organic frameworks can be classified based on various chemical conjugations, including 𝜋-conjugated microporous polymers (CMPs), [2] covalently-bonded organic frameworks (covalent organic frameworks: COFs), [3] and metal coordination-bonded organic frameworks (metal-organic frameworks: MOFs). [4] These synthetic porous materials with numerous combinations of organic building blocks possess unique properties, advantages, and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19][20] For example, CPPs provide a porous and morphologically stable architecture for acceptors to interact with the polymer and facilitate charge transfer. [21][22][23][24] 3D-network architectures provide quick and efficient pathways to move charges and energy within the network. 25,26 Also, the rate of doping and stability of the charge transfer complex are higher for CPPs than the linear polymers because of the suppression of p-p stacking interactions and higher free surface area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,26 Also, the rate of doping and stability of the charge transfer complex are higher for CPPs than the linear polymers because of the suppression of p-p stacking interactions and higher free surface area. 23,24 Despite these interesting features, CPPs are relatively underexplored for energy harvesting applications due to poor processability and lower electrical conductivities. 1,4,27 Systematic studies focused towards understanding the effect of the CPP structure and network architecture on doping efficiency and conductivity are essential to explore and harness the advantages of the CPPs porous architecture for energy harvesting applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%