2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.62.r16235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge transport inπ-conjugated polymers from extraction current transients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
101
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
101
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[87][88][89] The sample geometry and the required energy levels are similar to the one used in TOF technique. However, in contrast to TOF measurements, CELIV technique can be used for relatively thin samples.…”
Section: Carrier Extraction By Linearly Increasing Voltage and Photo-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[87][88][89] The sample geometry and the required energy levels are similar to the one used in TOF technique. However, in contrast to TOF measurements, CELIV technique can be used for relatively thin samples.…”
Section: Carrier Extraction By Linearly Increasing Voltage and Photo-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the CELIV method we have investigated various amorphous and microcrystalline hydrogenated silicon and π-conjugated polymers as well as their bulk heterojunction layers [3][4][5]. This method enables one to determine the reason of conductivity dependence on electric field strength and temperature: whether this dependence is caused by mobility or density of charge carriers [3].…”
Section: Methods and Their Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method enables one to determine the reason of conductivity dependence on electric field strength and temperature: whether this dependence is caused by mobility or density of charge carriers [3]. Also it enables one to compare the reasons of charge carrier mobility dependence on electric field strength: whether it is caused by stochastic transport, by micromobility dependence on electric field strength, or by release probability from trapping levels [6].…”
Section: Methods and Their Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5a shows the effect of an increased Ms due to SH while maintaining a constant quantity of SS, while in Fig. 5b [43], in the sense that when it is much larger that the Si or Al ionic radius, the ions can be considered as point charges with reduced interaction, while if it is in the same range with the ionic radius then this can allow for stronger ion-ion interactions. Thus, the initial reduction in the alkalinity from 5.6 to 3.1% would in turn reduce the Na ionic atmosphere and improve the Al and Si interaction, allowing less interference in the creation of bonds within the aluminosilicate gel framework and increasing the degree of connectivity.…”
Section: Stage Ii: Influence Of Alkali-activator Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%