2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016ja022447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charged particle behavior in the growth and damping stages of ultralow frequency waves: Theory and Van Allen Probes observations

Abstract: Ultralow frequency (ULF) electromagnetic waves in Earth's magnetosphere can accelerate charged particles via a process called drift resonance. In the conventional drift resonance theory, a default assumption is that the wave growth rate is time independent, positive, and extremely small. However, this is not the case for ULF waves in the real magnetosphere. The ULF waves must have experienced an earlier growth stage when their energy was taken from external and/or internal sources, and as time proceeds the wav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
115
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
10
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zong et al, 2007). More recently, the conventional picture of drift resonance has been extended to account for the finite temporal and spatial extents of the ULF waves (Zhou et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2016;Li et al, 2017;Hao et al, 2017), with the predicted signatures (such as increasingly tilted stripes in particle energy spectrum and boomerang-shaped structures in pitch angle spectrum) consistent with observations. Such diagnostic signatures have been unambiguously identified in Van Allen Probes observations (Dai et al, 2013;Claudepierre et al, 2013;Hao et al, 2014;Foster et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2016), providing clear evidence on the presence of drift resonance in the inner magnetosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zong et al, 2007). More recently, the conventional picture of drift resonance has been extended to account for the finite temporal and spatial extents of the ULF waves (Zhou et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2016;Li et al, 2017;Hao et al, 2017), with the predicted signatures (such as increasingly tilted stripes in particle energy spectrum and boomerang-shaped structures in pitch angle spectrum) consistent with observations. Such diagnostic signatures have been unambiguously identified in Van Allen Probes observations (Dai et al, 2013;Claudepierre et al, 2013;Hao et al, 2014;Foster et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2016), providing clear evidence on the presence of drift resonance in the inner magnetosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…We next follow Zhou et al (2016) to fix the ratio, by assuming a simplistic PSD distribution (a spatially independent power law distribution, ∝ W −3 ) for background particles, so as to convert W to . We next follow Zhou et al (2016) to fix the ratio, by assuming a simplistic PSD distribution (a spatially independent power law distribution, ∝ W −3 ) for background particles, so as to convert W to .…”
Section: Comparison With Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing number of spacecraft observations suggest that ULF waves significantly affect the dynamics of charged particles in the inner magnetosphere (e.g., Dai et al, ; Foster et al, ; Pokhotelov et al, ; Ren et al, , ; Volwerk, ; Yang, Zong, Fu, Li, et al, ; Zhou et al, , ; Zong et al, , ). In terms of particle energy and species, the inner magnetosphere can be divided into the radiation belts, ring current, and plasmasphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the residual PSD at the resonant pitch angles (30° and 150°) shows the inphase bidirectional pitch angle distributions in the upper panels of Figures a and c, which agrees with spacecraft observations(Ren, Zong, Zhou, et al, ; Yang, Zong, Fu, Takahashi, et al, ) and has an antiphase or inphase relationship with E Φ in the lower panels of Figures a and c, respectively. In Figures a and c, the phase shift across the resonant pitch angle is about 180° , which is difficult to be distinguished in observations due to phase mixing resulting from finite energy and pitch angle resolutions (Zhou et al, ), and spread resonant energies resulting from finite waveband width (Ren et al, ; Takahashi et al, ; Yang, Zong, Fu, Li, et al, ). The phase difference in Figure c is not close to 0°, which is associated with the ratio between the PSD variations related to the nonresonant effect (the term G 1 in equation ) and those related to the resonant effect (the term G 2 in equation ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Both conventional and generalized drift resonant theories have successfully predicted and explained the behaviors of resonant particles and their relationship with ULF waves (e.g., Dai et al, ; Hao et al, ; Li et al, ; Southwood & Kivelson, ; Zhou et al, ). Recent studies start to explore drift‐bounce resonant particle's signatures in both energy and pitch angle spectra (Yang et al, ), and the energy transfer between waves and particles (Takahashi et al, ), which is based on the drift‐bounce resonant theory proposed by Southwood and Kivelson (, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%