Charged particle scattering in dipolarized magnetotail

Lukin, A. S.; Artemyev, A. V.; Petrukovich, A. A.; Zhang, X. -J.

doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.05397

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This flux increase is also associated with a high ratio j loss /j trap ∼ 1 showing strong energy dispersion: larger energies with j loss /j trap ∼ 1 are closer to the Earth (see Figures 12c and 12d). This pattern most likely corresponds to the electron isotropic boundary (Imhof et al, 1979;Sergeev et al, 2012;Yahnin et al, 1997), that is, energetic electron scattering in the current sheet due to the magnetic field line curvature (Birmingham, 1984;Büchner & Zelenyi, 1989;Lukin, Artemyev, Petrukovich, & Zhang, 2021;Young et al, 2002). The curvature scattering efficiency depends on energy and the equatorial magnetic field curvature radius and intensity.…”

Section: ∕3mentioning

confidence: 97%

On the Role of Whistler‐Mode Waves in Electron Interaction With Dipolarizing Flux Bundles

2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The magnetotail is the main source of energetic electrons for Earth’s inner magnetosphere. Electrons are adiabatically heated during flow bursts (rapid earthward motion of the plasma) within dipolarizing flux bundles (concurrent increases and dipolarizations of the magnetic field). The electron heating is evidenced near or within dipolarizing flux bundles as rapid increases in the energetic electron flux (10–100 keV); it is often referred to as injection. The anisotropy in the injected electron distributions, which is often perpendicular to the magnetic field, generates whistler‐mode waves, also commonly observed around such dipolarizing flux bundles. Test‐particle simulations reproduce several features of injections and electron adiabatic dynamics. However, the feedback of the waves on the electron distributions has been not incorporated into such simulations. This is because it has been unclear, thus far, whether incorporating such feedback is necessary to explain the evolution of the electron pitch‐angle and energy distributions from their origin, reconnection ejecta in the mid‐tail region, to their final destination, and the electron injection sites in the inner magnetosphere. Using an analytical model we demonstrate that wave feedback is indeed important for the evolution of electron distributions. Combining canonical guiding center theory and the mapping technique we model electron adiabatic heating and scattering by whistler‐mode waves around a dipolarizing flux bundle. Comparison with spacecraft observations allows us to validate the efficacy of the proposed methodology. Specifically, we demonstrate that electron resonant interactions with whistler‐mode waves can indeed change markedly the pitch‐angle distribution of energetic electrons at the injection site and are thus critical to incorporate in order to explain the observations. We discuss the importance of such resonant interactions for injection physics and for magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling.

show abstract