DOI: 10.22215/etd/2018-12637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charged Particle Transport in Magnetic Fields in the EGSnrc Monte Carlo Code System

Abstract: The advent of magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy provides a promising technology for dealing with tumour motion and anatomical variations during treatment.These machines possess a variety of beam energies, geometrical configurations, and different magnetic field strengths. Although photon beams do not directly experience the influence of the magnetic field, electrons set in motion will curve and impact dose distributions. Clinical reference dosimetry protocols rely on correction factors which account … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed discrepancies of >1% between their values for the PTW 30013 chamber with orientation d (0.976) and other more recent values given in tables 5 and 6 might be explained by not considering the dead volume. Monte Carlo calculations of magnetic field correction factors which take into account the dead volume (see section 5.3 and table 4) have been done by Spindeldreier et al (2017), Malkov andRogers (2017, 2018) and Pojtinger et al (2019). However, since the simulated beam in the latter study was based on a spectrum from Ahmad et al (2016) the flatness might be different than in an actual MRI-linac beam.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Available Data For Chamber-type Specific K Fms...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed discrepancies of >1% between their values for the PTW 30013 chamber with orientation d (0.976) and other more recent values given in tables 5 and 6 might be explained by not considering the dead volume. Monte Carlo calculations of magnetic field correction factors which take into account the dead volume (see section 5.3 and table 4) have been done by Spindeldreier et al (2017), Malkov andRogers (2017, 2018) and Pojtinger et al (2019). However, since the simulated beam in the latter study was based on a spectrum from Ahmad et al (2016) the flatness might be different than in an actual MRI-linac beam.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Available Data For Chamber-type Specific K Fms...mentioning
confidence: 99%