2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charged Surface-Active Impurities at Nanomolar Concentration Induce Jones–Ray Effect

Abstract: The electrolyte surface tension exhibits a characteristic minimum around a salt concentration of 1 mM for all ion types, known as the Jones-Ray effect. We show that a consistent description of the experimental surface tension of salts, bases, and acids is possible by assuming charged impurities in the water with a surface affinity typical for surfactants. Comparison with experimental data yields an impurity concentration in the nanomolar range, well below the typical experimental detection limit. Our modeling … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

15
134
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
15
134
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, Figure 2d shows that the interfacial tension reduction for <0.1 mol/L Ca 2+ is~1.4 mN/m, similar to values obtained elsewhere [60]. Suggested reasons for this effect have been debated, and have included cation [60], anion [62][63][64] or impurity [65] adsorption, or electrostatic effects influencing water structure at the interface [66,67]. The curve fitted through the experimental data in Figure 2d is of the form γ = γ 0 − Aγ 0.5 + Bγ, where A and B are empirical constants (0.158 (mN/m) 0.5 and 0.217, respectively) and γ 0 is the interfacial tension of the n-heptane/water interface (48.4 mN/m).…”
Section: Na Adsorption At the N-heptane/water Interfacesupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Thus, Figure 2d shows that the interfacial tension reduction for <0.1 mol/L Ca 2+ is~1.4 mN/m, similar to values obtained elsewhere [60]. Suggested reasons for this effect have been debated, and have included cation [60], anion [62][63][64] or impurity [65] adsorption, or electrostatic effects influencing water structure at the interface [66,67]. The curve fitted through the experimental data in Figure 2d is of the form γ = γ 0 − Aγ 0.5 + Bγ, where A and B are empirical constants (0.158 (mN/m) 0.5 and 0.217, respectively) and γ 0 is the interfacial tension of the n-heptane/water interface (48.4 mN/m).…”
Section: Na Adsorption At the N-heptane/water Interfacesupporting
confidence: 66%
“…For the DTAB concentration at c b DTAB = 10 µM, the minimum is distinct and located at approximately c b NaCl = 100 mM. By using the mean-field theory for the surface tension of the air-electrolyte interface [22], we quantitatively explain the experimental data. This theory is based on the Poisson-Boltzmann equation with the ion-specific adsorption potentials such as…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This scenario is supported by the negative zeta potential of bubbles in water [21] and the repulsive disjoining pressure of wetting films on silica [1]. However, this scenario contradicts with the surface tension of NaOH solutions because the surface tension of NaOH solutions is larger than that of NaCl solutions, meaning Email address: uematsu@chem.kyushu-univ.jp (Yuki Uematsu) that OH − is more surface-inactive than Cl − [2,3,22]. Although other explanations were suggested [23,24], the experimental fact that the concentration and depth of the minima depend on independent measurements [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] implies uncontrolled hidden parameters in the experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations