The preference of XeF6 for either a trigonally
distorted or a regular octahedral structure is determined
by
a delicate balance of several competing factors. A regular
octahedron is favored (a) by electron correlation and (b)
by the relativistic contraction of the Xe 5s orbital.
In contrast, higher angular momentum (in particular
f-type) basis
functions on Xe favor a distortion. While earlier SCF or other
nonrelativistic calculations were in apparent agreement
with experimental evidence for a distorted structure, this has been due
to a partial cancellation of errors. The present
study contains all-electron calculations as well as calculations of the
valence-electrons in an effective core potential.
For the former, electron correlation has been included at the MP2
level and relativistic effects by means of direct
perturbation theory, for the latter the highest level was CCSD(T)
for the treatment of electron correlation, and
relativistic
effects were simulated by means of a quasirelativistic effective core
potential. Both sets of calculations lead to
consistent results. These indicate that the
“XeF6-like” XF6 compounds with light
central atoms or ions like ClF6
-
or BrF6
- prefer the structure of a regular
octahedron. The same is true for KrF6, which is not
stable with respect to
Kr + 3F2 but probably represents a local minimum.
For these light central atoms, electron correlation is
decisive
for a regular structure, while at Hartree−Fock level, i.e., ignoring
correlation effects, the structure of lowest energy
is distorted. Regular octahedra are also predicted for systems
with very heavy central atoms like RnF6,
AtF6
-, and
PoF6
2-. For these compounds
relativistic effects (supported by electron correlation) stabilize the
regular octahedron.
The situation is more complicated for XeF6,
IF6
-, and
TeF6
2-. Here the strong
distortion found at nonrelativistic
SCF level is compensated partly, but apparently not completely, by
electron correlation and relativistic effects. This
results in distorted, fluctuating structures with only little
stabilization compared to the regular octahedron. A
similar
situation holds for SeF6
2-.
None of the available simple models of main-group structural
chemistry is able to predict
or rationalize all of these structures. One inevitably has to use
more subtle descriptions.