1997
DOI: 10.1080/02786829708965476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charging and Collection of Submicron Particles in Two-Stage Parallel-Plate Electrostatic Precipitators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
55
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
11
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the decrease in particle charge with decrease in size, and increase in the drag forces with increase in size, ESPs typically have a collection efficiency minimum in the submicrometersize region (Flagan and Seinfeld 1988). Though not predicted by conventional ESP models, the capture efficiency has also been found to decrease significantly as particle size decreases in the ultrafine particle size region (Watanabe et al 1995;Kim and Biswas 1996;Yoo et al 1997;Zhuang et al 2000;Kulkarni et al 2002). This decrease has been attributed to partial charging of ultrafine particles (Zhuang et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, due to the decrease in particle charge with decrease in size, and increase in the drag forces with increase in size, ESPs typically have a collection efficiency minimum in the submicrometersize region (Flagan and Seinfeld 1988). Though not predicted by conventional ESP models, the capture efficiency has also been found to decrease significantly as particle size decreases in the ultrafine particle size region (Watanabe et al 1995;Kim and Biswas 1996;Yoo et al 1997;Zhuang et al 2000;Kulkarni et al 2002). This decrease has been attributed to partial charging of ultrafine particles (Zhuang et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…How the virus particles gain and lose charge was not examined in this work, and thus a detailed estimation of the parameters described in Zhuang et al (2000) was not done. However, the low charges on the ultrafine particles are attributed to poor diffusion charging and low ion attachment coefficients (Adachi et al 1985;Yoo et al 1997;Zhuang et al 2000;Kulkarni et al 2002).…”
Section: Capture Efficienciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collection efficiency of the smallest particles by an ESP is reduced because a portion of the incoming ultrafine particles do not receive a charge (partial charging). [145][146][147] However, in the ultrafine size range, diffusion and particle growth by condensation of water vapor become important removal mechanisms.…”
Section: Control Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ESPs have size-dependent collection efficiencies, and while overall mass-based collection efficiencies may be high (e.g., 99%), the collection efficiencies of particles in the submicrometer and nanometer particle size range, the size range associated with viruses and some allergens, are typically low (19)(20)(21)(22). In this ESP penetration window (0.1-to 1-m size range), electrical mobility, which is influenced by both particle charge and mechanical mobility, is at a minimum, and consequently, collection efficiency is also at a minimum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usefulness of ESP technology in mitigating biological aerosols of Ͼ1 m in diameter has been demonstrated using bacterial endospores and various bacterial species (12, 13). Other research involving electrostatic precipitation of bacterial cells and spores has focused on survival rates (i.e., bioavailability) after electrical charging as well as sampling efficiency for exposure assessment (14-18).ESPs have size-dependent collection efficiencies, and while overall mass-based collection efficiencies may be high (e.g., 99%), the collection efficiencies of particles in the submicrometer and nanometer particle size range, the size range associated with viruses and some allergens, are typically low (19)(20)(21)(22). In this ESP penetration window (0.1-to 1-m size range), electrical mobility,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%