2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3991(99)00196-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charging phenomena in PEEM imaging and spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…figure 1(c)). The tribofilms, composed of polyphosphate glasses, are non-conducting, and thus are subject to charging and suppression of secondary electron emission [57]. Furthermore, shadowing also creates artifacts, which also contributes to certain regions of the image appearing darker [37].…”
Section: Physical Interpretation Of Wear Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…figure 1(c)). The tribofilms, composed of polyphosphate glasses, are non-conducting, and thus are subject to charging and suppression of secondary electron emission [57]. Furthermore, shadowing also creates artifacts, which also contributes to certain regions of the image appearing darker [37].…”
Section: Physical Interpretation Of Wear Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The differential-thickness resulting from two rounds of Pt coating makes it possible to perform photoemission experiments on shells, minerals, rocks, or any other insulators, and was introduced by our group DeVol et al, 2014). It also prevents any charging phenomena or artifacts (Gilbert et al, 2000). Figure S7e shows a polished, trimmed, and coated sample, ready for PEEM analysis.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we estimate that the interaction between two pulses, when separated in time, is strongest near the sample. In a simple model considering the first stage of the PEEM and the sample described as a cathode/anode lens [50,51], the observed effect can be understood as a result of the field from the photoelectrons released by the XUV pulse effectively spreading out the photoelectrons from the IR pulse as indicated in Figure 10.18, acting as an additional electrostatic element in the system. As is also observed, this effect would exist no matter which pulse comes first as the photoelectron bunches would affect each other while moving through the lens system.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%