2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-013-0462-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charisma and conservation: charismatic megafauna’s influence on safari and zoo tourists’ pro-conservation behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
73
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
8
73
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We showed first that the level of charisma had a positive impact on animal choice, but a negative impact on the amount donated, or WTP. The positive effect of charisma on animal choice is consistent with previous literature (Bennett et al 2015, Skibins et al 2013); however, its negative effect on WTP is striking, and suggests that those who adopted less charismatic species probably engage more strongly with species conservation, acknowledging the strong selection biases that might exist in favour of charismatic species. In other words, committed people might tend to make a strategic choice, anticipating that some non-charismatic species are likely to attract little support and deciding to compensate accordingly.…”
Section: Charisma Effectssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…We showed first that the level of charisma had a positive impact on animal choice, but a negative impact on the amount donated, or WTP. The positive effect of charisma on animal choice is consistent with previous literature (Bennett et al 2015, Skibins et al 2013); however, its negative effect on WTP is striking, and suggests that those who adopted less charismatic species probably engage more strongly with species conservation, acknowledging the strong selection biases that might exist in favour of charismatic species. In other words, committed people might tend to make a strategic choice, anticipating that some non-charismatic species are likely to attract little support and deciding to compensate accordingly.…”
Section: Charisma Effectssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Only one study (Hill, Woodland, & Gough, 2007) describes an NBT experience lacking interpretation; in this case, the interpretationfree condition was developed by the researchers to compare the effects of rainforest visits with and without the use of information sheets. It was occasionally difficult to ascertain whether interpretation was included in all of the experiences that visitors undertook (Dearden, Bennett, & Rollins, 2007;Skibins, Powell, & Hallo, 2013;Stamation, Croft, Shaughnessy, Waples, & Briggs, 2007). For example, Skibins et al (2013) surveyed safari participants departing from a Tanzanian airport.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has revealed a number of the salient aspects of visitor wildlife experiences (including interpretation) that contribute the most to environmental learning (Luebke & Matiasek, 2013;Skibins, Powell, & Hallo, 2013). These include: the opportunity to observe animals in their 'natural' environment; opportunities for close encounters with wildlife and to observe animal behaviour; visitors' emotional engagement with animals; connecting with visitors' prior knowledge and experience; and providing time to reflect.…”
Section: Reaching the Zoo Or Aquarium Visitormentioning
confidence: 99%