Charm production in nonresonant<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>annihilations at<i>√s =</i>10.55 GeV

Bortoletto, D.; Goldberg, M.; Holmes, R.; Horwitz, N.; Jawahery, A.; Lubrano, P.; Moneti, G. C.; Sharma, V.; Shipsey, I. P. J.; Thoma, P.; Csorna, S. E.; Letson, T.; Mestayer, M. D.; Panvini, R. S.; Word, G. B.; Bean, A.; Bobbink, G. J.; Brock, I. C.; Ferguson, T.; Kraemer, R. W.; Vogel, H.; Bebek, C.; Berkelman, K.; Blucher, E.; Cassel, D. G.; Copie, T.; DeSalvo, R.; Dewire, J. W.; Ehrlich, R.; Galik, R. S.; Gilchriese, M.; Gittelman, B.; Gray, S. W.; Halling, A. M.; Hartill, D. L.; Heltsley, B. K.; Holzner, S.; Kandaswamy, J.; Kowalewski, R.; Kreinick, D. L.; Kubota, Y.; Mistry, N. B.; Muêller, J.; Namjoshi, R.; Nordberg, E.; Perticone, D.; Peterson, D.; Pisharody, M.; Read, K. F.; Riley, D.; Silverman, A.; Stone, S.; Sadoff, A. J.; Avery, P.; Besson, D.; Garren, L.; Bowcock, T. J. V.; Kinoshita, K.; Pipkin, F. M.; Procario, M.; Wilson, Richard; Wolinski, J.; Xiao, D.; Haas, P.; Hempstead, M.; Jensen, T.; Johnson, D. R.; Kagan, H.; Kass, R.; Baringer, P.; McIlwain, R. L.; Miller, D. H.; Shibata, E. I.; Behrends, S.; Guida, J. M.; Guida, J. A.; Morrow, F.; Poling, R.; Thorndike, E. H.; Tipton, P.; Alam, M. S.; Katayama, N.; Kim, I. J.; Li, W. C.; Lou, X.; Sun, C. R.; Tanikella, V.

doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.1719

Cited by 85 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 70 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The agreement of D B b (u) (right-most solid curve) with b-quark data (solid points) [25] is good. The dash-dot curve is the best-fit beta distribution with The associated dash-dot curve, a beta distribution with (p, q) = (7.0, 2.8), best describes the data from [26]. Both curves are consistent with the data, but errors are large below the FF peak mode.…”

Section: Identified Fragments and Partonssupporting

confidence: 67%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Fragmentation in e+e- collisions

Kettler¹,

Trainor²

2007

Proceedings of Correlations and Fluctuations in Relativistic Nuclear Collisions — PoS(CFRNC2006)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We analyze the energy scale dependence of fragmentation functions from e + -e − collisions using conventional momentum measures x p and ξ p and rapidity y. We find that replotting fragmentation functions on normalized rapidity u results in a compact form precisely represented by the beta distribution, its two parameters varying slowly and simply with parton energy scale Q. The resulting parameterization enables extrapolation of fragmentation functions to small Q in order to describe fragment distributions at low transverse momentum p t in heavy ion collisions at RHIC.

show abstract

Section: Identified Fragments and Partonssupporting

confidence: 67%

“…The solid dots are b → B data [25] compared to a best-fit beta distribution (dash-dot curve) and theory (solid curve). Low-statistics c → D data [26] are summarized by a best-fit beta distribution (dash-dot curve) and theory (solid curve).…”

Section: Identified Fragments and Partonsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fragmentation in e+e- collisions

Kettler¹,

Trainor²

2007

Proceedings of Correlations and Fluctuations in Relativistic Nuclear Collisions — PoS(CFRNC2006)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Most of the theoretical models [1] predict a hard fragmentation function for heavy quarks, consistent with experimental data collected in e e annihilation [2]. D*+ mesons produced in nonresonant low-energy e+e annihilation provide a unique place for the study of fragmentation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 79%

Study of continuumD*+spin alignment

Kubota¹,

Nelson²,

Perticone³

et al. 1991

Phys. Rev. D

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The spin alignment of D*+ mesons produced in e+e annihilation at &s =10.5 GeV is obtained from a study of the angular distribution of the decay D*+~D m+. The alignment is studied as a function of momentum and compared to theoretical predictions. We find an average value of the spin alignment parameter ti of (g) =0.04+0.02+0.01. We obtain a model-dependent measurement of the probability of producing a vector particle (Pr ) =0.77+0.02+0.01 for D mesons.

show abstract

“…The exceptional softness of the bquark FF (for unidentified fragments) was anticipated theoretically [48] (and cf. [49], and the b → B data are from [50]. The energies are dijet energies.…”

Section: Identified Partonsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Extrapolating parton fragmentation to lowQ2ine+−e−collisions

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We analyze the energy scale dependence of fragmentation functions from e + -e − collisions using conventional momentum measures xp and ξp and rapidity y. We find that replotting fragmentation functions on a normalized rapidity variable results in a compact form precisely represented by the beta distribution, its two parameters varying slowly and simply with parton energy scale Q. The resulting parameterization enables extrapolation of fragmentation functions to low Q in order to describe fragment distributions at low transverse momentum pt in heavy ion collisions at RHIC.

show abstract

Charm production in nonresonante+e−annihilations at√s =10.55 GeV

Abstract: We report results on the differential and total cross sections for inclusive production of the charmed particles D +, D, Du, D+, D"and A, in

Cited by 85 publications

References 70 publications

Fragmentation in e+e- collisions

Fragmentation in e+e- collisions

Study of continuumD*+spin alignment

Extrapolating parton fragmentation to lowQ2ine+−e−collisions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About