Evidence is accumulating that parts of our social lives are speeding up, a phenomenon known as social acceleration. The implications of social acceleration for people's ability to judge the veracity of online content, and ultimately for the spread of misinformation, are largely unclear. We examined the effects of accelerated online dynamics, operationalised as time pressure, on online misinformation evaluation. Participants judged the veracity of true and false news headlines in the presence or absence of time pressure. We used signal detection theory to disentangle the effects of time pressure on discrimination ability and response bias, as well as on four key determinants of misinformation susceptibility (i.e., analytical thinking, ideological congruency, motivated reflection, and familiarity). Time pressure reduced participants' capacity to distinguish between true and false news (discrimination ability), but did not alter their tendency to classify an item as true or false (response bias). With and without time pressure, higher analytical thinking skills were associated with higher discrimination ability, whereas familiarity with a headline was associated with lower discrimination ability. As for response bias, individuals in both treatments were more likely to classify a headline as true if it was congruent with their political identity and if it was familiar. Our results highlight the dangers of social acceleration online: People are less able to accurately judge the veracity of news, while prominent drivers of misinformation susceptibility (e.g., ideological congruency, familiarity) remain influential. Interventions aimed at increasing deliberation may thus be fruitful avenues to combat the spread of online misinformation.