2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charting the territory: Exploring stakeholder reactions to the prospect of seafloor exploration and mining in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants in this study seem to have responded either as if such asymmetry between economic damage to fishermen and irreversible ecological damages to an ecosystem did not exist, or that such damage was not significant, for example because damage is local and global presence of coral continues. This is an interesting result, which to some degree differs from attitudes to, for instance, GM foods in Europe (Nelson 2001), hazardous waste in the US (Hadden 1991) or marine mining in Australia (Mason et al 2010) where risk or uncertainty leads to precautionary attitudes. However, it must be noted that in addition to different methods being applied in the above studies, in our analysis the respondents are confronted with a trade-off that is not just related to an 'anonymous' beneficiary of an economic activity, but to fisheries.…”
Section: Irreversibility Precaution and Perceptions Of Harmmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Participants in this study seem to have responded either as if such asymmetry between economic damage to fishermen and irreversible ecological damages to an ecosystem did not exist, or that such damage was not significant, for example because damage is local and global presence of coral continues. This is an interesting result, which to some degree differs from attitudes to, for instance, GM foods in Europe (Nelson 2001), hazardous waste in the US (Hadden 1991) or marine mining in Australia (Mason et al 2010) where risk or uncertainty leads to precautionary attitudes. However, it must be noted that in addition to different methods being applied in the above studies, in our analysis the respondents are confronted with a trade-off that is not just related to an 'anonymous' beneficiary of an economic activity, but to fisheries.…”
Section: Irreversibility Precaution and Perceptions Of Harmmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…To delve more deeply into the ways in which people understand and reason about policy decisions that have an impact on CWC, we therefore employed a deliberative approach Howarth 2002, Lo andSpash 2013). Although well-developed and integrated in decision support (Söderholm 2001, Morgan 1996, studies that apply deliberative techniques to the precautionary principle by involving citizens and stakeholders are still rare (see Mason et al (2010) for one example). We combined group discussions and individual questionnaire responses in three focus groups carried out in Norway, to explore attitudes towards CWC and related services and values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source: Mason et al, 2010 Trade-offs: Need for sound cost -benefit analysis Like any major investment project, a detailed economic cost-benefit analysis should be undertaken for proposed DSM mining projects following established methodologies, which are presented in WBI (2001) among others and considering issues specific to DSM-mining:…”
Section: Box 4 What Type Of Information Is Needed To Determine Accepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, there have been attempts to compare the life cycle impacts of such resources with on-shore equivalents [51,52] which, while in the preliminary phases of the research, indicate that the expected impacts of mining itself (on the indicators of energy intensity and global warming potential) will be much higher than average terrestrial mines, and equivalent to some of the deepest mines onshore. The broader environmental impacts of such mineral deposits is still unclear, but it is apparent that social acceptance is likely to be a significant barrier even if the environmental impacts are shown to be low [53]. An important issue still to be understood is when or under what conditions these resources may become both economically feasible and environmentally beneficial in relation to conventional resources and secondary resources such as recycling.…”
Section: Critical Minerals and Unconventional Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%