2019 11th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iciteed.2019.8929967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chatbot Evaluation as Knowledge Application: a Case Study of PT ABC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, customers are sophisticated users of new technologies and text messaging in particular, which has led to businesses incorporating messaging to solve customers' problems. Sensuse et al (2019) affirm that chatbots have faster response compared to customer care personnel. They can run uninterruptedly, hence, the customer is assured of a quick answer at any time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Nowadays, customers are sophisticated users of new technologies and text messaging in particular, which has led to businesses incorporating messaging to solve customers' problems. Sensuse et al (2019) affirm that chatbots have faster response compared to customer care personnel. They can run uninterruptedly, hence, the customer is assured of a quick answer at any time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Nguyen (2019) also tried to examine whether a chatbot could improve the consumer experience when the chatbot possesses the capability of understanding. Research also has shown that chatbot agents that understand and use humans' humor are ranked more likable, cooperative, and capable as well as provide better solutions and performance than those that do not understand it (Sensuse et al 2019;Thies et al 2017). The dimension of understandability in this study is distinct from the information understandability (or ease of understanding) as one of the information quality dimensions proposed by Lee et al (2002) or Wang and Strong (1996).…”
Section: Chatbot Quality Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Kalia et al (2017) discovered that the reliability of chatbots can be ensured if a meaningful response is provided in a conversation. Sensuse et al (2019) also found that chatbots that are reliable could enhance the effectiveness of job performance and motivate further development.…”
Section: Chatbot Quality Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This model is based on the socio-technical approach and includes the technological and human components of using the system. There are six criteria for measuring the performance of IS, including system quality, information quality, service quality, intention to use, user satisfaction, and net benefit [16]. System quality, information quality, and service quality are main dimensions specifically used to evaluate the system, where intention to use and user satisfaction are thus impacted by these aspects [17].…”
Section: Delone and Mclean Success Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%