2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2012.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chebyshev tau meshless method based on the integration–differentiation for Biharmonic-type equations on irregular domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some extensions It is known that spectral methods have a big limitation, the geometry of the domain must be simple enough to allow the use of an appropriate orthogonal basis in which to expand the full set of possible solutions to the problem. In the previous work [19], we have taken advantage of the Domain Embedding Methods [20][21][22][23][24] to solve the problems defined on irregular domains. The idea of these methods is to approximate the solution to the original problem by the solution of an auxiliary problem in a fictitious regular domain in which the irregular geometry is embedded.…”
Section: The Ctmmid-ddm In Two-dimensional Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some extensions It is known that spectral methods have a big limitation, the geometry of the domain must be simple enough to allow the use of an appropriate orthogonal basis in which to expand the full set of possible solutions to the problem. In the previous work [19], we have taken advantage of the Domain Embedding Methods [20][21][22][23][24] to solve the problems defined on irregular domains. The idea of these methods is to approximate the solution to the original problem by the solution of an auxiliary problem in a fictitious regular domain in which the irregular geometry is embedded.…”
Section: The Ctmmid-ddm In Two-dimensional Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The starting point is the Chebyshev expansion of the mixed partial derivative u xxyy , then the lower derivatives or higher derivatives in both directions through an integration-differentiation process [19].…”
Section: The Differential Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, a comparison between the SEM and the isoparametric SEM is presented in figure 6 and table 1. For comparison of the two methods, the accuracy of a numerical solution produced by approximate schemes is measured via the L 2 norm error [19]:…”
Section: Rectangular Area Pierced By a Circular Holementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In numerical methods, the meshing of the irregular domains remains one of the most cumbersome and important steps in the entire solution process. To deal with problems with irregular domains, some methods have been proposed to overcome this problem, such as meshless local strong form method [9], the Chebyshev tau meshless method based on the integration-differentiation (CMMID) [19], direct expansion method of boundary condition (DEMBC) [24], boundary element method (BEM) [10], the finite element method (FEM) based on the triangular elements [23], the level-set function [21], the fractional step projection scheme [4], the Coons method, the Laplace method and boundary-blending method [3], isoparametric method [13], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shao et al. 7 used the Chebyshev tau meshless method based on integration–differentiation (CTMMID) for numerically solving bi-harmonic-type equations in irregular domains with complex boundary conditions. Then, Shao and Wu 8 use the Chebyshev tau meshless method (CTMM), which was based on the highest derivative, that solved the fourth-order equations in irregularly shaped domains with complex boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%