2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions for sensory product characterization by consumers: Investigations into the number of terms used in CATA questions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
0
14

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
78
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, consumers tended to find the CATA task easy and not tedious, regardless of how the terms were presented (Table 3). Average values were similar to those previously reported Jaeger et al, 2015). This suggests that the additional cognitive burden associated with changing the order in which the terms are presented on the CATA question is not detrimental in terms of consumers' perception of the task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…On average, consumers tended to find the CATA task easy and not tedious, regardless of how the terms were presented (Table 3). Average values were similar to those previously reported Jaeger et al, 2015). This suggests that the additional cognitive burden associated with changing the order in which the terms are presented on the CATA question is not detrimental in terms of consumers' perception of the task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The consumers were asked to check all descriptors that they felt applied to that sample, and to leave those descriptors that did not apply to the sample unchecked. There were 15 CATA descriptors selected because it has been shown that 10 to 17 CATA descriptors is optimal (Jaeger and others ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hughson e Boakes (2002) mostraram que o fornecimento de uma lista curta, em vez de uma lista maior, para descrever um conjunto de vinhos, levou a descrições mais eficientes. Em estudo mais abrangente, Jaeger et al (2015) analisaram sete estudos de consumidor envolvendo um total de 735 indivíduos e cinco categorias diferentes de produtos (biscoito, queijo, bebidas de frutas, chocolate e sobremesa láctea). O uso de listas "curtas" ou "longas" (10 a 17 termos versus 20 a 28 termos) teve pouco impacto na caracterização sensorial dos produtos.…”
Section: Alcantara M; Freitas-sá D G Cunclassified