2011
DOI: 10.1080/08838151.2011.597469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Check That Body! The Effects of Sexually Objectifying Music Videos on College Men's Sexual Beliefs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
70
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the women in our sample, men in this sample held a higher degree of stereotypical beliefs about sexuality and endorsement of music that degrades women to a higher degree, yet also had higher efficacy to avoid nonsexual physical IPV. Contrary to earlier research (Aubrey et al, 2011;Galdi et al, 2014;Kalof, 1999;Van Oosten et al, 2015), men's endorsement of the degradation of women in music was not associated with any of the consent negotiation outcomes. Additionally, men's beliefs in sexual stereotypes were not associated with their negotiation of sexual consent, which is also inconsistent with prior research (Warren et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the women in our sample, men in this sample held a higher degree of stereotypical beliefs about sexuality and endorsement of music that degrades women to a higher degree, yet also had higher efficacy to avoid nonsexual physical IPV. Contrary to earlier research (Aubrey et al, 2011;Galdi et al, 2014;Kalof, 1999;Van Oosten et al, 2015), men's endorsement of the degradation of women in music was not associated with any of the consent negotiation outcomes. Additionally, men's beliefs in sexual stereotypes were not associated with their negotiation of sexual consent, which is also inconsistent with prior research (Warren et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we did not find an effect of exposure to objectifying video clips on general attitudes toward sexual harassment, possibly because general attitudes are more stable and less malleable. Nevertheless, it is plausible that longer and stronger exposure to such media may modulate general attitudes toward sexual harassment (Aubrey et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, although Aubrey et al (2011)'s work informs us on the effect of objectifying media on general attitudes toward sexual harassment, it offers little insight into how perceivers may react to actual instances of sexual harassment. Indeed, like all abstract mental representations, general attitudes are often poor predictors of judgment of concrete situations pertaining to the object of the attitude (Correll, Park, Judd, & Wittenbrink, 2002;Fazio & Williams, 1986).…”
Section: Sexualized Media and Attitudes Toward Sexual Harassmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, as previously demonstrated researchers studying sexual objectification (SO) in media depictions (e.g., magazines, MTV videos, television) of women and girls have measured SO in part by the presence of revealing dress in those depictions (Aubrey et al, 2011;Johnson et al, 2007;Zurbriggen et al, 2011). In applying content analysis to various media (music videos, clothing on retail websites, girls' magazines, video game characters), other researchers have operationally defined SO in the media in part as the extent to which women's bodies are exposed to the gaze of others (Goodin et al, 2011;Graff et al, 2013;Vandenbosch et al, 2013).…”
Section: Revealing Dress and Sexualization In The Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Objectification is harmful to the objectifying person (Aubrey et al, 2011;Johnson, McCreary, & Mills, 2007;Zurbriggen, Ramsey, & Jaworski, 2011), as well as to the individual being objectified (Frederickson, Roberts, Noll, Quinn, & Twenge, 1998;Hebl, King, & Lin, 2004). Many researchers have studied objectification of others as a function of those others' revealing dress (Graff, Murnen, & Smolak, 2012;Gurung & Chrouser, 2007;Loughnan et al, 2010;Loughnan, Pina, Vasquez, & Puvia, 2013;Nezlek, Krohn, Wilson, & Marusken, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%