Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1858996.1859056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Checking roundoff errors using counterexample-guided narrowing

Abstract: This paper proposes a counterexample-guided narrowing approach, which mutually refines analyses and testing if (possibly spurious) counterexamples are found. A prototype tool CANAT for checking roundoff errors between floating point and fixed point numbers is reported with preliminary experiments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They appear as QF_NIA and QF_NRA categories in SMT-comp, respectively. Their applications include roundoff error analysis [16], [17], linear invariant generation [18] by Farkas's lemma, and polynomial/matrix interpretation in termination detection [19].Mizuhito Ogawa is a professor at the School of Information Science of Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST). He received MS and Dr. of Science from University of Tokyo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They appear as QF_NIA and QF_NRA categories in SMT-comp, respectively. Their applications include roundoff error analysis [16], [17], linear invariant generation [18] by Farkas's lemma, and polynomial/matrix interpretation in termination detection [19].Mizuhito Ogawa is a professor at the School of Information Science of Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST). He received MS and Dr. of Science from University of Tokyo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They appear as QF_NIA and QF_NRA categories in SMT-comp, respectively. Their applications include roundoff error analysis [16], [17], linear invariant generation [18] by Farkas's lemma, and polynomial/matrix interpretation in termination detection [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%