Checklist for cognitive and emotional consequences following stroke (CLCE-24): Development, usability and quality of the self-report version

Heugten, Caroline van; Rasquin, S.M.C.; Winkens, Ieke; Beusmans, George; Verhey, Frans R.J.

doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2006.10.002

Cited by 73 publications

(73 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The inconsistent results in the literature may partly be explained by the differences in stroke samples (e.g., primary focus on patients discharged home (Aben et al, 2011;Duits et al, 2008;Martin et al, 2002;van Heugten et al, 2007), or patients with a minor stroke (Narasimhalu et al, 2013;Xiong et al, 2011)), variability in the time interval after stroke used to assess SCC (e.g., early (Duits et al, 2008;Narasimhalu et al, 2013;Xiong et al, 2011) or chronic phase (Aben et al, 2011;Maaijwee et al, 2014)) and how SCC was defined and measured (van Rijsbergen et al, 2014). We defined SCC as a psychological construct with two components, a primary content component referring to the nature of cognitive difficulties, and an impact or worry component describing whether individuals report that their specific content-related SCC have an impact on their daily lives (van Rijsbergen et al, 2014(van Rijsbergen et al, , 2015.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 60%

“…The biomedical and psychological factors that play a role in post-stroke SCC are not well understood. Evidence suggests that objective indices of cognitive performance based on neuropsychological testing show correlations with post-stroke SCC as well as functioning after stroke as assessed using measures of activities of daily living (ADL) (Davis, Cockburn, Wade, & Smith, 1995;Narasimhalu, Wiryasaputra, Sitoh, & Kandiah, 2013;van Heugten, Rasquin, Winkens, Beusmans, & Verhey, 2007;Winkens, Van Heugten, Fasotti, & Wade, 2009;Xiong et al, 2011). However, the reported associations are relatively weak, and these factors do not explain the high prevalence of SCC in post-stroke patients (van Rijsbergen et al, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 69%

“…Assessments of SCC were obtained using the Checklist for Cognitive and Emotional consequences following stroke (CLCE) inventory (van Heugten et al, 2007). The CLCE is a standardised interview exploring post-stroke cognitive, emotional and behavioural complaints.…”

Section: Sccmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Psychological factors and subjective cognitive complaints after stroke: Beyond depression and anxiety

Rijsbergen

Mark

Kop

et al. 2018

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Subjective Cognitive Complaints (SCC) are common after stroke and adversely affect quality of life. In the present study, we determined the associations of depression, anxiety, perceived stress and fatigue with post-stroke SCC, and whether these associations were independent of objective cognitive functioning, stroke characteristics and individual differences in personality traits and coping styles. Using a cross-sectional design, SCC and psychological measures were obtained in 208 patients (mean 3.3 ± 0.5 months after stroke; 65.9% men; mean age 64.9 ± 12.4 years). SCC were assessed using the Checklist for Cognitive and Emotional consequences following stroke (CLCE) inventory. Validated questionnaires were used to measure depression and anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale), fatigue (Fatigue Assessment Scale), personality traits (Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised Short Scale) and coping style (Utrecht Coping List). Multivariate hierarchical linear regression analyses were used to adjust for covariates. Depression (β = 0.35), anxiety (β = 0.38), perceived stress (β = 0.39), and fatigue (β = 0.39) were associated with CLCE scores, independent of demographic, cognitive performance and stroke-related covariates. After including personality traits and coping styles in the model, independent associations with CLCE scores were found for fatigue (β = 0.26, p = .003) and neuroticism (β = 0.21, p = .05). Interventions aimed at improving psychological resilience and increasing energy levels might be a worthwhile addition to stroke rehabilitation programmes by reducing SCC and improving quality of life. ARTICLE HISTORY

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 60%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 69%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychological factors and subjective cognitive complaints after stroke: Beyond depression and anxiety

Rijsbergen

Mark

Kop

et al. 2018

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These instruments are meant to support healthcare professionals in deciding whether or not it would be advisable to refer a patient for a detailed cognitive assessment (i.e., for the second assessment stage). As an example of such a screening instrument, the CLCE-24 has been developed as a checklist for the detection of cognitive and emotional problems after stroke and is suitable to be used by healthcare professionals other than the trained (neuro)psychologist (Van Heugten et al, 2007). Obviously, screening instruments are intended to be quick to administer, low in costs and require limited effort of the patient.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Wayfinding Questionnaire as a Self-report Screening Instrument for Navigation-related Complaints After Stroke: Internal Validity in Healthy Respondents and Chronic Mild Stroke Patients

Claessen

Visser‐Meily

Rooij

et al. 2016

Arch Clin Neuropsychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: In current stroke care, cognitive problems are usually diagnosed in a stepwise manner. More specifically, screening instruments are first applied to support healthcare professionals in deciding whether a second step (an extensive assessment) would be appropriate. None of the existing screening instruments, however, takes navigation ability into account. This is problematic, as navigation impairment after stroke has been shown to be common, more so than previously thought. The Wayfinding Questionnaire (WQ) is therefore presented as a screening instrument for navigation-related complaints after stroke. The internal validity of the WQ was investigated in two samples of participants to establish the final version. Method and Results: In Study 1, the WQ was administered in a representative sample of 356 healthy participants. Its factor structure was investigated using a principal component analysis. This procedure resulted in deletion of four items and revealed a three-factor structure: "Navigation and Orientation," "Spatial Anxiety," and "Distance Estimation". In Study 2, a confirmatory analysis was performed to directly verify the factor structure as obtained in Study 1 based on data of 158 chronic mild stroke patients. Fit indices of the confirmatory analysis indicated acceptable model fit. The reliability of the three subscales was found to be very good in both healthy participants and patients. Conclusions: These studies allowed us to determine the final version of the WQ. The results indicated that the WQ is an internally valid and reliable instrument that can be interpreted using a three-factor structure in both healthy respondents and chronic mild stroke patients.

show abstract

“…Complaints may as well have a different structure -some of them are complaints relevant to determined difficulties (for example, memory, attention) (SCCc -subjective cognitive complaints -concept), while others reveal anxieties, fear, decreased mood in connection with difficulties being experienced or predicted (SCCw -volume 3(3), 5 worry) (van Rijsbergen, Mark, de Kort, & Sitskoom, 2015;van Heugten, Rasquin, Winkens, Beusmans, & Verhey, 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Emotionality and the assessment of memory performance (one’s own and that of other people)

Szepietowska¹

2015

Current Issues in Personality Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Checklist for cognitive and emotional consequences following stroke (CLCE-24): Development, usability and quality of the self-report version

Cited by 73 publications

References 13 publications

Psychological factors and subjective cognitive complaints after stroke: Beyond depression and anxiety

Psychological factors and subjective cognitive complaints after stroke: Beyond depression and anxiety

The Wayfinding Questionnaire as a Self-report Screening Instrument for Navigation-related Complaints After Stroke: Internal Validity in Healthy Respondents and Chronic Mild Stroke Patients

Emotionality and the assessment of memory performance (one’s own and that of other people)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About