1996
DOI: 10.1177/088840649601900406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Checklist for Successful Implementation of Field-Based Research

Abstract: In this paper, we describe a checklist for the implementation of a collaborative model for conducting field-based research. The purpose of this checklist is to provide assistance to university personnel interested in implementing quantitative single subject research investigations in field-based settings with classroom teachers, practicum students, or related services personnel implementing the intervention and assisting in data collection. Specifically, this checklist is designed to be used with personnel who… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the area of measurement, some participants failed to complete the postinservice measures. This was attributed to the extended time required, as similarly reported elsewhere (e.g., Hemmeter, Doyle, Collins, & Ault, 1996;Javorsky, Kline, & Zentall, 2000; i.e., not a bias systematically affecting only one intervention). As well, we relied on the accuracy of teachers' tallies on the Classroom Behavior Tally Checklist, because we were not provided with consent for video observation of whole classes of students.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In the area of measurement, some participants failed to complete the postinservice measures. This was attributed to the extended time required, as similarly reported elsewhere (e.g., Hemmeter, Doyle, Collins, & Ault, 1996;Javorsky, Kline, & Zentall, 2000; i.e., not a bias systematically affecting only one intervention). As well, we relied on the accuracy of teachers' tallies on the Classroom Behavior Tally Checklist, because we were not provided with consent for video observation of whole classes of students.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 76%