1989
DOI: 10.1097/00006231-198908010-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Checklists for quality assurance and audit in nuclear medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Probably because of the potentially hazardous nature of the radiopharmaceuticals used for nuclear medicine, there have been stricter and better audited guidelines (Williams et al 1989;Lamki et al 1990) for these imaging techniques than for most other radiological tests. As with all imaging, it is important that the correct test is used for the particular clinical problem.…”
Section: Radionuclide Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably because of the potentially hazardous nature of the radiopharmaceuticals used for nuclear medicine, there have been stricter and better audited guidelines (Williams et al 1989;Lamki et al 1990) for these imaging techniques than for most other radiological tests. As with all imaging, it is important that the correct test is used for the particular clinical problem.…”
Section: Radionuclide Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%