1955
DOI: 10.1016/0003-9861(55)90415-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chelating agents as metal buffers in biological systems. I. Principles and use of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fibres in a somewhat 'run down' state had smaller currents than fibres in a 'good condition'. The calcium-binding power of the EDTA is much greater than that of the citrate; the concentrations of unbound Ca in the EDTA and in the citrate solutions are about 10-10 M and 10-6M respectively, as calculated from the equations and constants given by Hastings, McLean, Eichel-berger, Hall & da Costa (1934), Schwarzenbach & Ackermann (1948 and Chaberek, Bersworth & Martell (1955), assuming 0-02-0-1 mm calcium contaminations in an ordinary 'Ca-free' Ringer's solution (see Frankenhaeuser, 1957). On the basis of this and the findings in the previous experiments it would be expected thatfibresin 'good condition,' also, would be completely inactivated at normal resting potential in the EDTA solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fibres in a somewhat 'run down' state had smaller currents than fibres in a 'good condition'. The calcium-binding power of the EDTA is much greater than that of the citrate; the concentrations of unbound Ca in the EDTA and in the citrate solutions are about 10-10 M and 10-6M respectively, as calculated from the equations and constants given by Hastings, McLean, Eichel-berger, Hall & da Costa (1934), Schwarzenbach & Ackermann (1948 and Chaberek, Bersworth & Martell (1955), assuming 0-02-0-1 mm calcium contaminations in an ordinary 'Ca-free' Ringer's solution (see Frankenhaeuser, 1957). On the basis of this and the findings in the previous experiments it would be expected thatfibresin 'good condition,' also, would be completely inactivated at normal resting potential in the EDTA solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These calculations were conducted according to the method described by Chaberek et al (1954), in which only Fe 3+ and H 1 " concentrations and the Fe 3+ -chelate formation and H* association constants (at ja = 0.1 M) are used in the calculation. The equation (for HEED) is: pFe = log Kj-ßL -log alpha + log (free HBED/FeHBED) or, for 10 % chelator excess: pFe = 39.68 -log alpha -1.0 where alpha = loi 12 -46 " P») + io( 23 -46 -2*pH) + 10 (31.78 -3*pH) +10 (36.42 -4*pH) + !…”
Section: Methods and Materiaismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and FeHBED in sinple aqueous solution (chelator = 11 pM, Fe 3+ = 10 ¿iM, u = 0.1). Calculations were conducted according to Chaberek et al (1954) using stability constants from Lindsay (1979) (see Table 2). The line for Fe(CH) 3 solubility is shown for ccnparison.…”
Section: Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical chemistry of metal-EDT A equilibria has been examined by several workers (Chaberek, Bersworth & Martell, 1955;Raaflaub, 1956) and methods for calculating the concentrations of free metal ion at equilibrium outlined. These treatments, however, are limited to simple cases when only one chelating metal ion is present.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%