Abstract.A comparative study of the determination of iodine in mineral waters is presented. Iodine was first determined by a standard titrimetric method and the results obtained were compared with those obtained by the faster and more sensitive radiochemical neutron activation method. For a series of waters, the results obtained by the two techniques were in fair agreement for the higher concentration levels of iodine, but for very low iodine levels the titrimetric method was insufficiently sensitive. The RNAA procedure was checked by standard addition experiments, and shown to be also valid when iodine was present as iodate.Key words: iodine, mineral waters, titrimetry, radiochemical neutron activation analysis.Underground waters with a higher content of dissolved mineral substances or compounds (> 1 g/l) and gases (> 250 mg/1) and with natural biological purity are classified as mineral waters [1,2]. The utilization of mineral waters for drinking and medico-balneological purposes necessitates reliable quantitative data on their essential micro-constituents, including iodine.Correlations between endemic goitre and iodine deficiency date from the last century. Clinical research on this phenomenon in different parts of the world also shows a good correlation between goitre and the iodine content of drinking waters. The frequency of its incidence is higher in areas where the iodine content in drinking waters is less than 3 #g/l, and iodination of the water considerably reduces this effect /-3, 4]. In comparison with normal ground and surface waters, mineral waters are usually enriched with iodine, though this can depend on the geological structure of