2005
DOI: 10.4067/s0716-97602005000400005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical and electric transmission in the carotid body chemoreceptor complex

Abstract: Carotid body chemoreceptors are complex secondary receptors. There are chemical and electric connections between glomus cells (GC/GC) and between glomus cells and carotid nerve endings (GC/NE). Chemical secretion of glomus cells is accompanied by GC/GC uncoupling. Chemical GC/NE transmission is facilitated by concomitant electric coupling. Chronic hypoxia reduces GC/GC coupling but increases G/NE coupling. Therefore, carotid body chemoreceptors use chemical and electric transmission mechanisms to trigger and c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subsequent question is what neurotransmitter(s) are responsible for translating the glomus cell activation into an electric signal in the afferent endings of the CSN. A remarkable feature of the CB is the presence of a broad diversity of endogenous neuroactive substances, including both the classical neurotransmitters and the neuromodulators (Eyzaguirre, 2005). It has been proposed that these substances play roles in the transmission of chemosensory information (Iturriaga & Alcayaga, 2004; Bairam & Carroll, 2005; Nurse, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subsequent question is what neurotransmitter(s) are responsible for translating the glomus cell activation into an electric signal in the afferent endings of the CSN. A remarkable feature of the CB is the presence of a broad diversity of endogenous neuroactive substances, including both the classical neurotransmitters and the neuromodulators (Eyzaguirre, 2005). It has been proposed that these substances play roles in the transmission of chemosensory information (Iturriaga & Alcayaga, 2004; Bairam & Carroll, 2005; Nurse, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of enzymes, a process‐driven customisation is achievable through the combination of molecular evolution techniques and highly efficient expression systems . Furthermore, like the cellular post‐translational modifications that increase the functional diversity of the proteome (e.g., the covalent addition of functional groups, the formation of intra‐ or intermolecular bonds or a proteolytic cleavage), the functionality of recombinant enzymes can be refined using well‐established techniques of chemical modification of the enzyme surface . The literature is abundant with examples of proteins covalently modified with tags of all kinds for different purposes: purification, stabilisation, labelling, or even editing enzyme function .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Furthermore,l ike the cellular post-translational modificationst hat increase the functional diversity of the proteome (e.g.,t he covalent addition of functional groups, the formation of intra-or intermolecular bonds or ap roteolytic cleavage), the functionality of recombinant enzymesc an be refined using well-established techniques of chemical modification of the enzymes urface. [4][5][6][7] The literature is abundant with examples of proteins covalently modified with tags of all kinds for different purposes:p urification, stabilisation, labelling, or even editing enzymef unction. [8][9][10][11] Therefore, the combination of surface-located modulators with robust enzymes offers opportunities for developing biomolecule-based catalysts with entirely new sets of functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Simultaneous intracellular (sharp electrode) recordings of glomus cells and afferent nerve endings in a slice preparation of rodent carotid body failed to detect any excitatory coupling between the glomus cell and nerve ending – a result that Eyzaguirre characterized as “puzzling” (Eyzaguirre, 2005; Jiang and Eyzaguirre, 2006). …”
Section: Summary and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%