2016
DOI: 10.1002/sia.5984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical and homogeneity changes of a Nafion membrane surface associated to its doping with the cation of the room‐temperature ionic liquid AliquatCl

Abstract: Chemical and textural changes in a commercial Nafion‐112 membrane as a result of its doping with the cation of the room temperature ionic liquid (RTIL) tricaprylmethylammonium chloride (Aliquat+) are analysed by X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), contact angle and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The XPS results show changes in the membrane surface as a result of partial coverage by the RTIL‐cation, taking into account the increase in the doped sample surface of the atomic concentration percentage of nitrog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A close examination of XPS literature over the last few decades reveals discrepancies in assignment of these O1s peak signals to the two possible atomic configurations within the Nafion structure. Upon examination of 25 prior publications, 52% assign the peak at E b ∼533.0 eV to oxygen atoms in the -SO 3 − configuration and the peak at E b ∼535.7 eV to oxygen in the ether configuration (n = 13 papers); 15,23,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] 40% assign the peaks in the opposite arrangement, with -SO 3 − oxygen atoms identified as signal at 535.7 eV and ether atoms at 533.0 eV (n = 10). [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] Another two papers (8% of the literature) identify these binding energies as O1s signals but are careful not to differentiate or assign the peaks to specific configurations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A close examination of XPS literature over the last few decades reveals discrepancies in assignment of these O1s peak signals to the two possible atomic configurations within the Nafion structure. Upon examination of 25 prior publications, 52% assign the peak at E b ∼533.0 eV to oxygen atoms in the -SO 3 − configuration and the peak at E b ∼535.7 eV to oxygen in the ether configuration (n = 13 papers); 15,23,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] 40% assign the peaks in the opposite arrangement, with -SO 3 − oxygen atoms identified as signal at 535.7 eV and ether atoms at 533.0 eV (n = 10). [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] Another two papers (8% of the literature) identify these binding energies as O1s signals but are careful not to differentiate or assign the peaks to specific configurations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%