The area's natural analogues, vitrifi ed forts, combustion technology, and vitrifi ed waste have been reviewed. The purpose was to identify if investigations of vitrifi ed rock in hill forts might be warranted for assessing the long-term integrity of vitrifi ed waste in natural environments. Wastes that are being vitrifi ed include ash from incineration of domestic waste, contaminated soil and fi ssion products from reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel. It was found that vitrifi ed materials in at least 200 hill forts constitute good anthropogenic analogues to vitrifi ed waste. The compositions vary considerably from site to site and even within one site and may correspond relatively well to the spans of parameters in the various vitrifi ed wastes. Glasses in vitrifi ed forts compare favourably to archaeological artefacts which are soda-and potash-based and consequently have different corrosion behaviours and may weather too quickly. Natural glasses might be too limited in composition variation and are perhaps also too durable. Combustion technology considerations based on quality of heat analyses indicate that at least some of the vitrifi cations of hill forts were carried out with the specifi c purpose of achieving strong and durable constructions. This makes it considerably easier to envisage how the vitrifi cations might have been carried out, and this, in turn, facilitates comparisons between anthropogenic analogues and modern vitrifi ed wastes.