“…However, due to the multiple energy transfer steps involved, this strategy could result in a delay of the scintillation time response, detrimental for fast applications. On the other hand, the use of hybrid organic/inorganic compounds − or the loading of polymeric hosts with optically inert dense nanoparticles (NPs) are alternative approaches recently proposed to enhance the stopping power of liquid and polymeric conjugated scintillators. − In principle, the presence of dense NPs including high atomic number Z elements would affect indeed both the Compton and photoelectric interactions because the interaction probability with high energy photons, such as X-rays and γ-rays, quickly increases with the effective material electronic density and the effective Z value. Rather than to create luminescence centers, the role of these inorganic fillers is therefore to enhance the efficacy of the transformation of the absorbed energy into electronic excitations, which will then be transferred through nonradiative mechanisms to the final emitter. , In particular, NP-loaded composite scintillators show a composition-dependent behavior, − and trade-off conditions that maximize the ϕ LY can be found. , However, a clear explanation of the effect that correlates the presence of NPs with the scintillation performance is still under debate.…”