2009
DOI: 10.3989/scimar.2009.73n2387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical bioactivity of sponges along an environmental gradient in a Mediterranean cave

Abstract: SuMMarY: The bioactivity of the most abundant sponges from three communities in a Mediterranean cave was assessed by Microtox ® assay in two seasons, spring (June) and autumn (november). We quantified bioactivity as a proxy for the investment in production of biologically active substances, and we related sponge bioactivity to growth form, growth rates, and physical contacts of each species with other species. We established a threshold for classifying a species as bioactive based on a comparison between the r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many biological or environmental factors can affect these patterns. Marine organisms can modify their levels of secondary metabolites in response to predation (e.g., Cronin and Hay, 1996a;Rohde et al, 2004), but other factors including nutrient availability, light, UV radiation, and temperature can also influence this plasticity (Uriz et al, 1995;Becerro and Paul, 2004;Turon et al, 2009). Investigations on the variability of secondary metabolites within a sponge species are scarce and controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many biological or environmental factors can affect these patterns. Marine organisms can modify their levels of secondary metabolites in response to predation (e.g., Cronin and Hay, 1996a;Rohde et al, 2004), but other factors including nutrient availability, light, UV radiation, and temperature can also influence this plasticity (Uriz et al, 1995;Becerro and Paul, 2004;Turon et al, 2009). Investigations on the variability of secondary metabolites within a sponge species are scarce and controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…With a broad geographic distribution, S. massa is of both ecological and potential biotechnological importance on Indo-Pacific reefs. The variability of secondary metabolite production in sponges can be pronounced both on an inter-and intraspecific level (Turon et al, 1996;Betancourt-Lozano et al, 1998;Turon et al, 2009). Intraspecific production of secondary metabolites may vary among populations or even among individuals (Turon et al, 1996;Page et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies on hard-bottom assemblages suggest the processes determining spatiotemporal distribution patterns in marine caves to be highly complex, being context and scale dependent (BenedettiCechi et al 1998;Bussotti et al 2006). Thus, many other factors have been proposed to explain the distribution patterns observed (always for hard-bottom communities): physico-chemical gradients with respect to salinity, temperature, density and dissolved oxygen (Gili et al 1986;Zabala et al 1989;Harmelin 1997), diffusion-sedimentation processes (Garrabou and Flos 1995), the persistence of microlayer gradients along the walls (Gili et al 1986), variation in larval settlement and post-settlement events (Benedetti-Cechi et al 1996;Harmelin 1997;Denitto et al 2007), biotic interactions between species (Benedetti-Cechi et al 1996;Martí et al 2004bMartí et al , 2005Turon et al 2009), presence of hydrothermal springs (Benedetti-Cechi et al 1996, 1998, the depth and the exposure of the entrance (Corriero et al 2000;Bell 2002), differences in internal topography (Martí et al 2004a, b) and presence or absence of secondary openings (Zabala et al 1989). One of the main explications for the distribution of crustacean softbottom communities in the present study could be grain size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous workers have sought to relate specific bioactivity to ecological function and small scale environmental gradients [47], [48] and use ecology and biology to explain intraspecific variability [33], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53]. However, there are no published studies that comprehensively integrate a diverse range of biodiversity and bioactivity measurements across vast bioregional and phylogenetic gradients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%