2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2860(01)00962-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical bonding effect in electron scattering by gaseous molecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ref. 58 ). For the QΔS signal at Q>1 Å -1 , they do not match the characteristic shape of inelastic scattering.…”
Section: Ab Initio Electron Scattering Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. 58 ). For the QΔS signal at Q>1 Å -1 , they do not match the characteristic shape of inelastic scattering.…”
Section: Ab Initio Electron Scattering Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to the assumption that conventional (independent atom model, IAM) HRTEM image simulation is sufficient for structural and elemental identification. The effect of binding electrons has been detected experimentally in electron diffraction experiments [7,8], but so far was not discerned in TEM images. However, diffraction experiments are limited to periodic structures and sufficiently large samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A chemical bonding effect has been observed in the electron scattering signal of molecules in the gas phase, observed mainly at small scattering angles (Iijima et al, 1965;Fink & Kessler, 1967;Duguet & Jaegle, 1975;Hirota et al, 1981;An-Ding & Xiao-Lei, 1995). This has been theoretically studied to quantify the effect in a number of molecules (Bonham & Iijima, 1963;Wang et al, 1994;Hoffmeyer et al, 1998;Shibata et al, 1999Shibata et al, , 2002. We discuss this effect in the total X-ray and electron scattering of gas-phase molecules, further quantifying the error that occurs in the structure determination, and proposing an approach to separate out the molecular structure contribution in the signal from the contribution from the electronic structure.…”
Section: Background On Gas-phase X-ray and Electron Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak percent differences for CHD and naphthalene are relatively large, with %�Iðq ¼ 2:4Þ = À 9.6% and %�Iðq ¼ 2:7Þ = À 8.6%, respectively. They are pure hydrocarbons which have been reported to contain larger chemical bonding effects compared with molecules such as CCl 4 , N 2 , O 2 and CS 2 (Shibata et al, 2002). This is due to delocalization of electrons by chemical bonding, which the IAM does not take into account, including double and triple bonds, aromatic rings, and hydrogen atoms bonded to heavier atoms.…”
Section: Iam and Ab Initio Scattering Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%