1995
DOI: 10.1063/1.468914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical bonding in water clusters

Abstract: Different sizes of water clusters from a dimer to twenty water molecules are studied using density functional theory. The binding energies of water clusters are calculated, and a relationship in terms of a simple function has been found between binding energy and the size of the water clusters. The interpolation of this correlation function reproduces the binding energies for the other water clusters to an accuracy within 1 kcal/mol. The extrapolation of the function gives the binding energy, −11.38 kcal/mol, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
101
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
16
101
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5] As we can see from Figs. 4 and 5, the hydrogen bond length in the second and third solvation shell is comparable with that of water clusters.…”
Section: Structure Of Large Hydrated Proton Clustersmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…[3][4][5] As we can see from Figs. 4 and 5, the hydrogen bond length in the second and third solvation shell is comparable with that of water clusters.…”
Section: Structure Of Large Hydrated Proton Clustersmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…(H 2 O) n , n ! 3 clusters have been investigated extensively for a long time, in theoretical studies employing electronic structure techniques (e.g., ), a variety of analytical potentials (e.g., [14,15,), and a combination of both (e.g., [87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97]). For n ¼ 3-5, a cyclic lowest energy Figure 4.…”
Section: General Characteristics Of Cluster Oh Stretch Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24] This is probably due to a larger numbers of H-bonds in the finite INTs. The characteristic example is (H 2 O) 20 with INT 5 4 and INT 4 5 predicted to be global minima in many studies, [25][26][27] while the methods which attribute higher energies to the strains in water rings predict other structures to have lower energies. 28,29 The main problem in the consideration of water systems is that they allow for numerous arrangements of H-bonds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%