2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.03.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical changes exhibited by latent fingerprints after exposure to vacuum conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be useful when a fingerprint is smudged or details of the donor are not contained within the fingerprint database. Many techniques have been proposed for these applications, including spectroscopic techniques [30], which lack the selectivity of mass spectrometry methods; chromatography based approaches [22,29] which require considerable sample preparation and consume at least an entire fingerprint; and vacuum based methods [20][21][22][23][24][25], which have lower sample throughput and have been shown to degrade fingerprint chemistry [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be useful when a fingerprint is smudged or details of the donor are not contained within the fingerprint database. Many techniques have been proposed for these applications, including spectroscopic techniques [30], which lack the selectivity of mass spectrometry methods; chromatography based approaches [22,29] which require considerable sample preparation and consume at least an entire fingerprint; and vacuum based methods [20][21][22][23][24][25], which have lower sample throughput and have been shown to degrade fingerprint chemistry [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no obvious modification except for some very minor shrinking of small droplets of material. The detrimental pressure identified by Bright et al was around 2 Â 10 À5 Torr (2.6 Â 10 À3 Pa), whereas 80 Pa is well above this value [28].…”
Section: Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (Esem)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Secondly, samples have to be placed in a high-vacuum chamber to produce a good-quality image. Both coating and high vacuum will have detrimental effects on the fingermark residue; inevitable and uncontrollable modifications such as water and lipid evaporation will occur [28]. Coating procedures, which also require vacuum, will obscure the samples and thus prevent any further light microscopy observation.…”
Section: Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (Esem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have also been carried out in order to study the changes occurring in fingermark composition over time. While GC/MS has often been used for this purpose [1][2][3][4]7,9,48], the use of advanced mass spectrometry techniques [12,14], liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC/MS) [49] and m-FTIR [36,41,43,45,46] have also been successful. Further details about these studies are summarised in a number of reviews [50][51][52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this study also reported the greatest loss of lipid material during the first 3 months following deposition, no relevant classification of fingermarks based on age could be obtained using principal component analysis (PCA). Another study compared fingermark aging under ambient and vacuum conditions and observed that exposure to vacuum caused a significant reduction in the lipid composition of fingermarks, with the loss of tetradecanoic and pentadecanoic acid particularly noted [41,46]. The effect of temperature on the aging of fingermark residue (from room temperature to 80 8C) was also studied, and a general decrease in the absorbance of the main bands of lipid components was noted with increasing temperature; this was postulated to be the result of degradation to lower molecular weight compounds with subsequent volatilisation [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%