“…With respect to FABP4, tricosylic acid and linoleic acid had comparably higher docking scores of −6.0 and −6.3 kcal/mol, respectively, though which were lower than rosiglitazone (−8.3 kcal/mol). However, the number of interactions of these SSEO compounds (24 (comprising 2 H bonds (Ala75, Thr24), 11 van der Waal forces (Glu72, Thr60, Asp76, Arg78, Arg126, Ser53, Lys58, Ser55, Val25, Tyr19, Arg106) and 11 (Met20, Ala36, Pro38, Phe51, Ala33, The16, Tyr128, Cys117, Ile104, Met40, Val115) pi-alkyl bonds) Figure 7A), and 22 (which are 1 H bond (Arg126), 12 van der Waals (Gln95, Thr74, Arg78, Val25, Asp76, Lys58, Ser53, Ser55, Cys117, Val115, Tyr128, Arg106) and 9 alkyl/ pi-alkyl (Tyr19, Phe16, Met20, Ala75, Ala33, Ala36, Pro38, Phe57, Ile104) respectively) was higher than that of rosiglitazone (22) [2 H bonds (Arg106, Ser53)], 14 van der Waal (Val23, Arg78, Tyr19, Val115, Tyr128, Ser55, Val25, Met20, Asp76, Gln95, Ala75, Ala33, Phe57, Thr60), 1 pi-cation (Arg126), 1 pi-sulfur (Phe16) and 4 pi-alkyl groups (Cys117, Ile104, Pro38, Ala36) (Figure 7B). Tricosylic acid in complexation with PPARD had the highest docking score (−7.1 kcal/mol) when compared with the other compounds; the score (which was lesser than rosiglitazone, −8.7 kcal/mol) correlated with interaction plot results, exhibiting the highest number (25) consisting of 1 H bond (His287), 9 (Phe316, Trp228, Leu317, Thr252, Phe291, Phe246, Gln250, Leu433, Met417) van der Waals, 2 unfavorable donor-donor bonds (Tyr437, Thr253), and 12 alkyl forces (Leu219, Ile213, Val312, Arg218, Val245, Leu323, Val305, Leu294, Cys249, Ile322, Ile328, Lys331, and 1 pi-alkyl force (His413) (Figure 8A).…”