2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.marchem.2004.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical characterization of dissolved organic material in Pony Lake, a saline coastal pond in Antarctica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
102
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
102
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrafiltration employing a tangential flow ultrafiltration system with a 1 kD nominal weight cutoff membrane was extensively evaluated by Ronald Benner and coworkers (e.g., Benner et al, 1992;Benner et al, 1997) and is widely used for the chemical characterization of DOM. Ultrafiltration may be followed by C 18 solid phase extraction (SPE) or XAD chromatography (Brown et al, 2004;Simjouw et al, 2005). It is important to realize that ultrafiltration is based on a physical separation of DOM, whereas SPE and XAD chromatography are based on chemical fractionation, which divide DOM into hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds.…”
Section: Molecular Mass Distribution Of Dommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ultrafiltration employing a tangential flow ultrafiltration system with a 1 kD nominal weight cutoff membrane was extensively evaluated by Ronald Benner and coworkers (e.g., Benner et al, 1992;Benner et al, 1997) and is widely used for the chemical characterization of DOM. Ultrafiltration may be followed by C 18 solid phase extraction (SPE) or XAD chromatography (Brown et al, 2004;Simjouw et al, 2005). It is important to realize that ultrafiltration is based on a physical separation of DOM, whereas SPE and XAD chromatography are based on chemical fractionation, which divide DOM into hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds.…”
Section: Molecular Mass Distribution Of Dommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A widely used method for the elucidation of the molecular mass distribution of DOM at a finer scale, which in addition provides information on the chemical composition of DOM, is size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and high-pressure size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) (Brinkmann et al, 2003a;Brinkmann et al, 2003b;Brown et al, 2004;Chin et al, 1994;Gaberell et al, 2003;Reemtsma and These, 2005;Schmitt et al, 2001;Schwede-Thomas et al, 2005). SEC not only separates DOM compounds based on size (hydrodynamic radii), but also ion-exclusion and hydrophobic interactions of the fractions with the column material can occur (Schmitt et al, 2001).…”
Section: Molecular Mass Distribution Of Dommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Model humic compounds (Table 1) derived from a solely microbial source as well as terrestrial sources from both aquatic environments and soil systems exhibit many of the same optical properties despite their dispirit methods, of generation in the environment and source materials (Brown et al, 2004). All show a pH dependent absorbance, exhibit increasing absorbance as wavelength decreases and a loss of absorbance upon borohydride reduction (Ma et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By removing a moiety suspected of participating in electronic interaction, long wavelength absorbance is partially or entirely lost and fluorescence emission increases and blue shifts (Ma et al, 2010). A direct comparison of divergent sources of fulvic and humic acid model compounds including an aquatic terrestrially derived fulvic acid, Suwannee River fulvic Acid (SRFA) and a microbial source of fulvic acid, Pony Lake fulvic Acid (PLFA) (Brown et al, 2004;McKnight et al, 1994), the soil derived humic acids Elliott humic acid (EHA) and Leonardite humic acid (LHA) and a terrestrially derived aquatic humic acid Suwannee River humic acid (SRHA) ( Table 1). Analysis and comparison of untreated and borohydride reduced model humic compounds particularly at short wavelength (< 350) using potentiometric and optical titrations, spectral slope values (S), difference plots (A) (Dryer et al, 2008), fluorescence emission spectra, (Jørgensen et al, 2011), and fluorescence difference spectra (F) (Del Vecchio & Blough, 2004) provide insight into how electronic interactions work universally in the environment as well as how differences that exist between sources humic materials can potentially augment existing knowledge about the fate and transport of humic substances in the environment (Hernes & Ronald Benner, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%