2018
DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-2585-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical characterization of fine particulate matter emitted by peat fires in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, during the 2015 El Niño

Abstract: Abstract. Fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) was collected in situ from peat smoke during the 2015 El Niño peat fire episode in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Twenty-one PM samples were collected from 18 peat fire plumes that were primarily smoldering with modified combustion efficiency (MCE) values of 0.725-0.833. PM emissions were determined and chemically characterized for elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon (OC), water-soluble OC, water-soluble ions, metals, and organic species. Fuel-based PM 2.5 mass emi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
98
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
8
98
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres concentrations of these two categories of particulate matter could range from 6 to 35%, as estimated by comparing the PM 2.5 and PM 10 data observed in Singapore during a wildfire event ( Figure S6). The observed PM and CO ratios at Pekanbaru in 2013 and 2014 were comparable to those observed as a result of peat/peatland fires in Kalimantan in 2015 (Jayarathne et al, 2018;Stockwell et al, 2016;Wooster et al, 2018) as well as the data obtained in Selangor in Malaysia (Roulston et al, 2018). The range of PM and CO ratios also overlaps with an experimental study of Malaysian peat fires (Othman & Latif, 2013).…”
Section: 1029/2018jd028564supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres concentrations of these two categories of particulate matter could range from 6 to 35%, as estimated by comparing the PM 2.5 and PM 10 data observed in Singapore during a wildfire event ( Figure S6). The observed PM and CO ratios at Pekanbaru in 2013 and 2014 were comparable to those observed as a result of peat/peatland fires in Kalimantan in 2015 (Jayarathne et al, 2018;Stockwell et al, 2016;Wooster et al, 2018) as well as the data obtained in Selangor in Malaysia (Roulston et al, 2018). The range of PM and CO ratios also overlaps with an experimental study of Malaysian peat fires (Othman & Latif, 2013).…”
Section: 1029/2018jd028564supporting
confidence: 83%
“…In addition to greenhouse gases, the peatland burning also emits particulate matter as well as its precursors (Black et al, 2016;Engling et al, 2014;Fujii et al, 2014;Gaveau et al, 2014;Huijnen et al, 2016;Iinuma et al, 2007;Jayarathne et al, 2018;Parker et al, 2016;Roulston et al, 2018;Whitburn et al, 2016;Wooster et al, than 1 K. Aerosol particles emitted by tropical peatland burning influence the cloud formation process over the region (Rosenfeld, 1999). These aerosol particles also influence the health and lives of the people living in the region (Crippa et al, 2016;Koplitz et al, 2016;Kunii et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data for emission of metals could be represented as emission factor or ER (Andreae & Merlet, 2001). In this section, ER, which is defined as metal emission per mass of PM (μg/g), is reported (Jayarathne et al, 2018). Emission factor was not quantified, as CO and CO 2 were not measured during the burning experiments.…”
Section: Er Of Metals In Pmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cl -concentration during the P1 period was slightly higher than that of the P2 period, which suggests a slight influence of wildfires. Table 2 summarizes the ratios of organic matter (OM, which is OA from ToF-ACSM) to OC (OM:OC), OC:EC, and WSOC:OC from the current and previous ambient measurements (Agarwal et al, 2010;Aggarwal et al, 2013;Balasubramanian et al, 2003;Engling et al, 2014;Jayarathne et al, 2018;Kunwar and Kawamura, 2014;Park and Cho, 2011;See et al, 2006See et al, , 2007Ye et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2017). The OM:OC ratio of the current study (~1.8) is slightly higher than 1.6 estimated from urban air samples influenced by traffic emissions (Zhang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Diurnal Profiles Of Aerosol Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%